Garmin International, Inc. v. Itc ( 2017 )


Menu:
  •       NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
    United States Court of Appeals
    for the Federal Circuit
    ______________________
    GARMIN INTERNATIONAL, INC., GARMIN USA,
    INC., GARMIN CORPORATION,
    Appellants
    v.
    INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION,
    Appellee
    NAVICO INC., NAVICO HOLDING AS,
    Intervenors
    ______________________
    2016-2584
    ______________________
    Appeal from the United States International Trade
    Commission in Investigation No. 337-TA-921.
    ______________________
    Decided: June 13, 2017
    ______________________
    NICHOLAS P. GROOMBRIDGE, Paul, Weiss, Rifkind,
    Wharton & Garrison LLP, New York, NY, argued for
    appellants. Also represented by JENNIFER H. WU,
    JENNIFER DIANE CIELUCH; DAVID J. BALL, JR., DAVID K.
    STARK, Washington, DC.
    2                         GARMIN INTERNATIONAL, INC.   v. ITC
    MEGAN MICHELE VALENTINE, Office of General Coun-
    sel, United States International Trade Commission,
    Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by
    DOMINIC L. BIANCHI, WAYNE W. HERRINGTON, SIDNEY A.
    ROSENZWEIG.
    KIRK T. BRADLEY, Alston & Bird LLP, Charlotte, NC,
    argued for intervenors. Also represented by MATTHEW S.
    STEVENS, CHRISTOPHER CHARLES ZIEGLER.
    ______________________
    Before PROST, Chief Judge, DYK, and REYNA, Circuit
    Judges.
    REYNA, Circuit Judge.
    In one of three appeals from a Section 337 investiga-
    tion, Garmin International, Inc., Garmin USA, Inc., and
    Garmin Corporation (collectively, “Garmin”) appeal from
    a Modified Limited Exclusion Order (“Modified Order”) of
    the United States International Trade Commission
    (“Commission”) prohibiting entry into the United States of
    products and components of products infringing various
    claims of 
    U.S. Patent No. 8,305,840
     (“’840 patent”) and
    
    U.S. Patent No. 8,605,550
     (“’550 patent”).
    Our decision today in a related case, Garmin Interna-
    tional, Inc. v. International Trade Commission, No. 16-
    1572, reverses the Commission’s finding of validity and
    finds all of the patent claims referenced by the Modified
    Order invalid as obvious over the prior art. Because we
    have already reversed the Commission’s underlying
    decision, we dismiss this appeal as moot.
    DISMISSED
    COSTS
    No costs.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 16-2584

Filed Date: 6/13/2017

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/17/2021