Ninestar Tech. Co., Ltd. v. International Trade Commission ( 2009 )

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2008-1201 NINESTAR TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD., NINESTAR TECHNOLOGY COMPANY, LTD., TOWN SKY, INC., Appellants, and DATAPRODUCTS USA, LLC, Appellant, v. INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION, Appellee, and EPSON PORTLAND INC., EPSON AMERICA, INC., AND SEIKO EPSON CORPORATION, Intervenors. Edward F. O’Connor, The Eclipse Group LLP, of Irvine, California, argued for all appellants. Wayne W. Herrington, Assistant General Counsel, Office of the General Counsel, United States International Trade Commission, of Washington, DC, argued for appellee. With him on the brief were James M. Lyons, General Counsel, and Michael K. Haldenstein, Attorney. Harold A. Barza, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart Oliver & Hedges, LLP, of Los Angeles, California, argued for intervenors. With him on the brief were Tigran Guledjian and Aaron B. Craig; and Sanford I. Weisburst, of New York, New York. Of counsel on the brief were Louis S. Mastriani and Michael L. Doane, Adduci, Mastriani, & Schaumberg L.L.P., of Washington, DC. Appealed from: United States International Trade Commission NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2008-1201 NINESTAR TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD., NINESTAR TECHNOLOGY COMPANY, LTD., TOWN SKY, INC., Appellants, and DATAPRODUCTS USA, LLC, Appellant, v. INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION, Appellee, and EPSON PORTLAND INC., EPSON AMERICA, INC., AND SEIKO EPSON CORPORATION, Intervenors. Judgment ON APPEAL from the United States International Trade Commission in CASE NO(S). 337-TA-565 This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: Per Curiam (MICHEL, Chief Judge, SCHALL and PROST, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT DATED January 13, 2009 /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly, Clerk