Flexiteek Americas, Inc. v. Plasteak, Inc. , 424 F. App'x 959 ( 2011 )


Menu:
  • NOTE: ThiS order is nonprecedential
    United States Court of AppeaIs
    for the FederaI Circuit
    FLEXITEEK AMERICAS, INC. AND FLEXITEEK
    INTERNATIONAL AS, _
    Plain.tiffs-Appellees,
    v.
    PLASTEAK, INC. AND PLASDECK, INC.,
    Defem:lants-Appellants,
    AND
    ANDRE BATISTA, ``
    Defenclant.
    2010-1256
    Appea1 from the United States Dist1'ict C0urt for the
    Southern District of F10rida in case n0. 08~CV-60996,
    Judge James I. C0hn.
    ON MOTION
    Before GA.JARSA, 1vL»x_YER, and PROsT, C'ircuit Juclges.
    GAJARSA, Circu,it Judge.
    ORDER
    FLEXITEEK AMERICAS V. PLASTEAK INC 2
    This court directed the parties to respond whether
    PlasTEAK, Inc. and PlasDECK, lnc.‘s (PlasTEAK) appeal
    from the February 5, 2010 order of the United States
    District Court for the Southern District of Florida granting
    a permanent injunction should be dismissed as moot in
    light of the district court’s subsequent July 20, 2010 order
    terminating the permanent injunction. Flexiteek Americas,
    Inc. and Flexiteek lnternational AS (Flexiteek) respond
    and argue that this appeal is moot The appellant,
    PlasTEAK, argues that this appeal is not moot.
    PlasTEAK urges this court not to dismiss the appeal
    arguing that the appeal should continue to resolve its
    concerns regarding liability for infractions of the injunction
    between issuance of the injunction and the c0urt’s termina-
    tion order. A1though that issue might present a case or
    controversy, it does not do so here. This appeal is of the
    district court's injunction, which is no longer in effect and
    not of any possible order for contempt Notably, even if
    PlasTEAK were to prevail in this appeal that would not
    necessarily dispose of any question as to contempt of an
    injunction. See generally Emery Air Frieght C'0rp. v. L0cal
    Union 2.95, 
    449 F.2d 586
    , 591 (2d Cir. 1971) ("Accordingly,
    the preliminary injunction as granted was improper.
    However, this conclusion does not dispose of the question of
    contempt, to which we now turn.”).
    Accordingly,
    . IT ls 0R1)ERED THAT:
    (1) This appeal is dismissed.
    (2) Each side shall bear its own costs.
    Date
    cc: S. Tracy Long, Esq.
    Bruce H. Wilson, Esq.
    3 FLEXITEEK AMERICAS V. PLASTEAK INC
    FoR THE CoURT
    J an Horb a1y
    Clerk
    sr
    s»
    as
    as
    ser
    >w1l'*
    MAY 2 7  /sf Jan Horbal__\;
    ED
    APPEALs ron
    L curious
    s19
    HAY,2 7 2011
    .|ANHORBALY
    C|.U
    0
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 2010-1256

Citation Numbers: 424 F. App'x 959

Judges: Gajarsa, Mayer, Prost

Filed Date: 5/27/2011

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024