Insituform Technologies v. Amerik Supplies, Inc. ( 2013 )

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ INSITUFORM TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND INA ACQUISITION CORP., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. AMERIK SUPPLIES, INC. (formerly known as BJR Trading U.S.A., Inc.) AND ERIK NIELSEN, Defendants/Third Party Plaintiffs- Appellees, v. COSMIC-SONDERMASCHINENBAU GMBH, Third Party Defendant-Appellant. ______________________ 2012-1655, -1656 ______________________ Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois in No. 08-CV-0333, Judge Timothy C. Batten, Sr. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ DEAN L. FRANKLIN, Thompson Coburn LLP, of St. Louis, Missouri, argued for plaintiffs-appellees. With him on the brief were ALAN H. NORMAN, MICHAEL L. NEPPLE and MATTHEW A. BRAUNEL. DANIEL A. KENT, Kent Law, P.C., of Alpharetta, Geor- gia, argued for third party defendant-appellant. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, PROST, and WALLACH, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT September 23, 2013 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk