Case: 13-3050 Document: 13 Page: 1 Filed: 03/07/2013
CORRECTED ORDER ISSUED: March 7, 2013
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
WENDY W. GHANNAM,
Petitioner,
v.
MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD,
Respondent.
______________________
2013-3050
______________________
Petition for review from the Merit Systems Protection
Board in case no. DC0841120179-I-1.
______________________
ON MOTION
______________________
ORDER
The Office of Personnel Management moves to recap-
tion to designate the Merit Systems Protection Board
(“Board”) as the respondent.
Pursuant to
5 U.S.C. § 7703(a)(2), the Board is desig-
nated as the respondent when the Board's decision con-
cerns the procedure or jurisdiction of the Board. The
employing agency is designated as the respondent when the
Case: 13-3050 Document: 13 Page: 2 Filed: 03/07/2013
2 WENDY GHANNAM v. MSPB
Board reaches the merits of the underlying case. Here, the
Board dismissed Wendy Ghannam’s petition for lack of
jurisdiction. Thus, the Board is the proper respondent in
this petition for review.
Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED THAT:
The motion is granted. The revised official caption is
reflected above. The respondent should calculate its brief
due date from the date of filing of this order.
FOR THE COURT
/s/ Jan Horbaly
Jan Horbaly
Clerk
s25
