Corning Optical Communications v. Panduit Corp. ( 2019 )

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ CORNING OPTICAL COMMUNICATIONS LLC, Appellant v. PANDUIT CORP., Appellee ______________________ 2019-1248, 2019-1250 ______________________ Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2017- 01073, IPR2017-01074. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ JOHN C. O'QUINN, Kirkland & Ellis LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellant. Also represented by HANNAH LAUREN BEDARD, JASON M. WILCOX; ERIC DAVID HAYES, Chicago, IL. JOHN J. MOLENDA, Steptoe & Johnson, LLP, New York, NY, argued for appellee. Also represented by ROBERT GREENFELD; KELLY J. EBERSPECHER, DANIEL STEVEN STRINGFIELD, Chicago, IL; KATHERINE DOROTHY CAPPAERT, Washington, DC. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (LOURIE, REYNA, and HUGHES, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT December 10, 2019 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court