All Courts |
Federal Courts |
US Court of Appeals Cases |
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit |
2000-03 |
Georgia-Pacific Corporation, Plaintiff-Cross v. United States Gypsum Company and L&w Supply Corporation , 204 F.3d 1359 ( 2000 )
Menu:
-
204 F.3d 1359 (Fed. Cir. 2000)
GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Cross Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES GYPSUM COMPANY and L&W SUPPLY CORPORATION, Defendants-Appellants.97-1238,-1244
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Dated: February 23, 2000
The mandate of the court will issue on March 1, 2000.1Appealed from: United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Judge Roderick R. McKelvie
2Albert E. Fey , Fish & Neave, of New York, New York, for plaintiff-cross appellant. With him on the brief were W. Edward Bailey and Steven C. Cherny . Of counsel on the brief was Jack B. Blumenfeld , Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell, of Wilmington, Delaware.
3James M. Amend , Kirkland & Ellis, of Chicago, Illinois, for defendants- appellants. With him on the brief was David K. Callahan . Of counsel on the brief was Jay I. Alexander , Kirkland & Ellis, of Washington, DC.
ORDER
4A combined petition for rehearing and suggestion for rehearing en banc having been filed by the Appellants, and a response thereto having been invited by the court and filed by the Cross-appellant, and the petition for rehearing having been referred to the panel that heard the appeal, and thereafter the suggestion for rehearing en banc and response having been referred to the circuit judges who are in regular active service,
UPON CONSIDERATION THEREOF, it is
5ORDERED that the petition for rehearing be, and the same hereby is, GRANTED to make the attached alteration to the opinion, and it is further
6ORDERED that the suggestion for rehearing en banc be, and the same hereby is, DECLINED.
7The mandate of the court will issue on March 1, 2000.
ATTATCHMENT
8United States Gypsum Company's petition for rehearing is granted only to make the following deletion from the opinion issued on November 1, 1999 [195 F.3d at 1322]:
9Page 14, lines 21-23 [195 F.3d at 1330]: Delete the sentence "Moreover, the boards claimed by Georgia Pacific in its ElSystem were not 'old boards,' but instead were themselves pantented products."
Document Info
Docket Number: 97-1238, 97-1244
Citation Numbers: 204 F.3d 1359
Filed Date: 3/1/2000
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/4/2024