Bove v. Dept. Of Veterans Affairs ( 2011 )


Menu:
  • 1
    NOTE: This order is 11onprecedential.
    United States Court of AppeaIs
    for the FederaI Circuit
    ANTHONY BOVE,
    C'lo',imant-Appellant,
    V.
    ERIC K. SHINSEKI, SECRETARY OF VETERANS
    AFFAIRS,
    Responclent-Appellee.
    nn
    2010-7072
    Appea1 from the United States Court of Appea1s for
    Veterans C1aims in case no. 08-1468, Judge Wi11iam A.
    Moorman.
    ON MOTION
    Before RADER, Chief Judge, LoUR1E and O’MALLEY, Cz1r-
    cuit Judges.
    RADER, Chief Judge.
    0 R D E R
    The Secretary of Veterans Affairs moves without op-
    position to vacate the judgment of the United States
    BOVE V. DVA 2
    Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims and to remand for
    further proceedings
    The appellant filed a notice of appeal with the Court
    of Veterans Claims more than 120 days after the Board of
    Veterans’ Appeals mailed its decision in his case. That
    court dismissed the appeal as untimely, concluding that
    the 120-day appeal period established by 
    38 U.S.C. § 7266
    (a) for seeking review of Board of Veterans’ Appeals
    decisions is jurisdictional and not subject to equitable
    tolling. The appellant sought this court's review
    This court stayed the briefing schedule in this appeal
    pending the United States Supreme Court’s review of our
    decision in Hen.ders0n v. Shinseki, 
    589 F.3d 1201
     (Fed.
    Cir. 2009) (en banc) (afE1rming Court of Appeals for Vet-
    erans Claims determination that period to appeal to that
    court is not subject to equitable tolling). In Henders0n ex
    rel. Henclerson v. Sh,inseki, 
    131 S.Ct. 1197
     (QO11), the
    Supreme Court reversed this court’s decision and con-
    cluded that the 120-day deadline for filing an appeal with
    the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims does not have
    jurisdictional consequences. Because the Court of Ap-
    peals for Veterans Claims erred in concluding that the
    appeal deadline established by § 7266(a) is jurisdictional,
    we vacate the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims’
    judgment and remand for further proceedings
    Accordingly,
    IT ls ORDERED THAT:
    (1) The motion is granted The judgment is vacated
    and the case is remanded for further proceedings
    (2) All sides shall bear their own costs.
    3
    HAY 2 5 2011
    Date
    cc: Stephen J. Wenger, Esq.
    Alex P. Hontos, Esq.
    s20
    BOVE v. DVA
    FoR THE CoURT
    lsi J an Horbaly
    J an Horbaly
    Clerk
    Issued As A Mandate:  2 5
    men
    va cover
    THE FED€l{Alf|.[?}llE":\‘?'3|flsl``f:0R
    |‘1AY'Z5 2011
    JANHORBAL¥
    C|.EH(
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 2010-7072

Judges: Rader, Lourie, O'Malley

Filed Date: 5/25/2011

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/5/2024