Harris v. United States ( 2014 )


Menu:
  • Case: 14-5005      Document: 17      Page: 1     Filed: 06/04/2014
    NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.
    United States Court of Appeals
    for the Federal Circuit
    ______________________
    WILLIAM OSCAR HARRIS,
    Plaintiff-Appellant,
    v.
    UNITED STATES,
    Defendant-Appellee.
    ______________________
    2014-5005
    ______________________
    Appeal from the United States Court of Federal
    Claims in No. 1:13-cv-00069-VJW, Judge Victor J. Wolski.
    ______________________
    ON MOTION
    ______________________
    PER CURIAM.
    ORDER
    William Oscar Harris moves for leave to proceed in
    forma pauperis.
    Harris is currently incarcerated. Pursuant to the
    Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA), a prisoner is barred
    from proceeding in forma pauperis if three or more prior
    Case: 14-5005         Document: 17   Page: 2     Filed: 06/04/2014
    2                                   HARRIS    v. US
    actions or appeals have been dismissed as frivolous or
    malicious or for failure to state a claim:
    In no event shall a prisoner bring a civil action or
    appeal a judgment in a civil action or proceeding
    under this section if the prisoner has, on 3 or
    more prior occasions, while incarcerated or de-
    tained in any facility, brought an action or appeal
    in a court of the United States that was dismissed
    on the grounds that it is frivolous, malicious, or
    fails to state a claim upon which relief may be
    granted, unless the prisoner is under imminent
    danger of serious physical injury.
    28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).
    The court notes that three or more actions or appeals
    filed by Harris have been dismissed as frivolous, as mali-
    cious, or for failure to state a claim. See Harris v. United
    States, No. 1:13-cv-00879-UNA (D.D.C. June 11, 2013);
    Harris v. United States, No. 2:13-cv-214-WTL-MJD (S.D.
    Ind. July 15, 2013); Harris v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons, No.
    1:13-cv-01144-UNA (D.D.C. July 29, 2013). Moreover,
    Harris has not suggested that he is in imminent danger of
    serious physical injury.
    Accordingly,
    IT IS ORDERED THAT:
    If Harris does not pay the $455 filing fee within 30
    days of the date of this order, his appeal will be dismissed.
    FOR THE COURT
    /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole
    Daniel E. O’Toole
    Clerk of Court
    s24
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 2014-5005

Judges: Per Curiam

Filed Date: 6/4/2014

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/6/2024