In Re Morgan Stanley ( 2011 )


Menu:
  • NOTE: This order is nonprecedential
    United States Court of AppeaIs
    for the FederaI Circuit
    IN RE MORGAN STANLEY, MORGAN STANLEY &
    CO. INCORPORATED, J.P. MORGAN CHASE & CO.,
    J.P. MORGAN SECURITIES, INC., J.P. MORGAN
    CLEARING CORP., CREDIT SUISSE HOLDINGS
    (USA), INC., CREDIT SUISSE SECURITIES (USA)
    LLC, THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC.,
    GOLDMAN SACHS & CO., GOLDMAN SACHS
    EXECUTION & CLEARING LP, SWS GRUP, INC.,
    AND SOUTHWEST SECURITIES, INC.,
    Petitioners. ``
    Misce11ane0us Docket No. 962
    On Petition for Writ of Mandamus to the United
    States District C0urt for the Eastern District of TeXas in
    case no. 09-CV-0326, Judge Leonard DaVis.
    IN RE BATS TRADING, INC. (ALso KNoWNAs BATS
    ExoHANGE, INc.), THE NASDAQ OMX GROUP, INC.,
    NASDAQ OMX PHLX, INC., INTERNATIONAL
    SECURITIES EXCHANGE, LLC, CHICAGO BOARD
    0PTIONS EXCHANGE, INCORPORATED, NYSE
    EURONEXT, NYSE ARCA, INC., NYSE AMEX, LLC,
    SECURITIES INDUSTRY AUTOMATION
    IN RE MORGAN STANLEY 2
    CORPORATION, OPTIONS PRICE REPORTING
    AUTHORITY, BOSTON OPTIONS EXCHANGE
    GROUP, LLC, CME GROUP, INC., BOARD OF
    TRADE OF THE CITY OF CHICAGO, INC., AND NEW
    YORK MERCANTILE EXCHANGE, INC.,
    Petiti0ners.
    Misce1laneous Docket No. 964
    On Petition for W1'it of Mandamus to the United
    States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in
    case nos. 09-CV-0327, Judge Leo11ard Davis.
    IN RE THOMSON REUTERS CORPORA:I‘ION,
    FACTSET RESEARCH SYSTEMS INC.,
    BLOOMBERG L.P. AND INTERACTIVE DATA
    CORPORATION,
    Petiti0ners.
    Miscel1aneous Docket No. 967
    On Petition for Wri1; of Mandamus to the United
    States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in
    case no. 6:09-CV-00333, Judge Leonard Davis.
    Be-fore RAoER, Ch£ef Judge, NEWMAN and BRYsoN, Circu,i.t
    Judges;
    PER CURIAM.
    3 1N RE MoRGAN sTANLEY
    0 R D E R
    Upon consideration of CME Group, Inc.’s motion for a
    stay of proceedings in the United States District Court for
    the Eastern District of Texas,
    IT IS ORDERED THAT:
    The motion is denied.*
    FoR THE CoURT
    HA¥ 1 1 2011 /S/ Jan H0rba1y
    Date J an Horba1y _
    C1erk -
    ocr Danie1A. DeVito, Esq. us _ F"_ED
    §:§::;t§:;;»,aPSq~
    Scott F. Partridge, Esq. HAY '*-1 1 2011
    Rick L. Ran1bo, Esq.
    David R. Francescani, Esq. mg 1.mR5ALy
    Michae1M. Murray, Esq. C|_[|qK
    Lynn E. Rzonca, Esq.
    J ames H. Sha1ek, Esq.
    Benjamin W. Hattenbach, Esq.
    Constance S. Huttner, Esq.
    John M. DiMatteo, Esq.
    Brian E. Moran, Esq.
    C1erk, United States District Court For The Eastern
    District Of Texas
    s19
    " With regard to the parties’ arguments regarding
    when this court’s mandate may issue, we note that this
    court does not issue mandates relating to petitions for
    writs of n1andamus. Fed. Cir. R. 40(e).
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 2011-M962

Filed Date: 5/11/2011

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/18/2021