Groves v. Dept. Of Veterans Affairs ( 2011 )


Menu:
  • NOTE: This order is nonprecedential
    United States Court of AppeaIs
    for the FederaI Circuit
    GENE S. GROVES,
    C'£aimant-Appellant,
    V.
    ERIC K. SHINSEKI, SECRE'I‘ARY OF VETERANS
    AFFAIRS,
    Respondent-Appellee.
    2010-7057 ``
    Appea1 from the United States Court of Appea1s for
    Veterans C1aims in 06-1252, Chief Judge Wi11iarn P.
    Greene, Jr.
    ON MOTION
    Bef0re GAJARsA, ScHALL, and MooRE, Circuiz Ju,dges.
    PER CUR1AM.
    0 R D E R
    Gene S. Groves moves for fees under the Equal Access
    to Justice Act (EAJA) incurred during his appeal before
    this court.
    On November 15, 2U10, this court granted the Secre-
    tary of Veterans Affairs’ motion to remand Groves’ appeal
    =
    GROVES v. DVA 2
    to allow the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans
    Claims to rule on Groves’ pending motion for reconsidera-
    ti0n. Groves appeared before this court without represen-
    tation. Groves subsequently filed this motion seeking
    $10,280.98 in total expenses and fees, including $9,962.50
    for 79.7 hours of legal research at $125.00 per hour.
    Pro se litigants like Groves are not eligible to recover
    attorney fees under EAJA. Naekel v. Dep’t of Trcmsp.,
    F.A.A, 
    845 F.2d 976
    , 981 (Fed. cia 193s) (“We conclude
    that neither EAJA nor the Back Pay Act authorizes
    payment to l\/[r. Naekel for the time spent acting pro se in
    his appeal to this court."); see also Hexamer u. Foreness,
    
    997 F.2d 93
    , 94 (5th Cir. 1993) (denying attorney fees
    under EAJA to pro se 1itigant); Demo:rest v. Manspeaker,
    
    948 F.2d 655
    , 655-56 (10th Cir. 1991) (same); Sommer v.
    Sazzzvan, sss F.2d s95, 395-96 (2d cia 1_990)``(per cu-
    riam), cert denied 
    498 U.S. 980
     (1990) (same); ll/ferrell u.
    Bl0ck, 
    309 F.2d 639
    , 642 (9ch cia 19s7) (Same). with
    regard to the additional amount Groves seeks for copying
    expenses and postage, this court’s prior remand order did
    not award him costs and he has never submitted an
    itemized and verified bill.
    Accordingly,
    IT ls OR:oERED THAT:
    The motion is denied.
    l FoR THE CoURT
    APR 1 8 2011
    /s/ J an Horba1y
    Date J an Horbaly
    Clerk
    cc: Gene S. Groves
    Steven M. Mager, Esq.
    319 u.s. c0un1EBlFl»E\l=)PEALs son
    ms storm cannon
    APR 1BZD11
    .|AN HORBALY
    CLEH!
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 2010-7057

Judges: Gajarsa, Schall, Moore

Filed Date: 4/18/2011

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 11/5/2024