Virnetx Inc. v. Hirshfeld ( 2022 )


Menu:
  • Case: 17-2593    Document: 65     Page: 1    Filed: 04/04/2022
    NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.
    United States Court of Appeals
    for the Federal Circuit
    ______________________
    VIRNETX INC.,
    Appellant
    v.
    ANDREW HIRSHFELD, Performing the Functions
    and Duties of the Under Secretary of Commerce for
    Intellectual Property and Director of the United
    States Patent and Trademark Office,
    Intervenor
    ______________________
    2017-2593
    ______________________
    Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark
    Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2016-
    00693.
    -------------------------------------------------
    VIRNETX INC.,
    Appellant
    v.
    ANDREW HIRSHFELD, Performing the Functions
    and Duties of the Under Secretary of Commerce for
    Intellectual Property and Director of the United
    States Patent and Trademark Office,
    Intervenor
    Case: 17-2593    Document: 65      Page: 2    Filed: 04/04/2022
    2                                  VIRNETX INC.   v. HIRSHFELD
    ______________________
    2017-2594
    ______________________
    Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark
    Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2016-
    00957.
    ______________________
    Before PROST, REYNA, and CHEN, Circuit Judges.
    PROST, Circuit Judge.
    ORDER
    In response to this court’s September 16, 2021 and Feb-
    ruary 15, 2022 orders, the parties inform the court how
    they believe these appeals should proceed.
    In Appeal No. 2017-2594, VirnetX Inc. challenges the
    Patent Trial and Appeal Board’s June 12, 2017 final writ-
    ten decision concerning claims of 
    U.S. Patent No. 7,921,211
    . On August 1, 2019, this court issued its decision
    in VirnetX Inc. v. Apple Inc., 
    931 F.3d 1363
    , 1380 (Fed. Cir.
    2019), affirming separate Board decisions finding the same
    claims of the patent unpatentable. In light of that decision,
    the parties agree that Appeal No. 2017-2594 is moot and
    the underlying Board decision should be vacated.
    In Appeal No. 2017-2593, VirnetX informs the court
    that its request for Director review was denied and it has
    filed an amended notice of appeal. VirnetX further pro-
    poses a briefing schedule to which the intervenor does not
    object.
    Upon consideration thereof,
    IT IS ORDERED THAT:
    (1) The above-captioned appeals are deconsolidated.
    The revised official captions are reflected above.
    Case: 17-2593      Document: 65   Page: 3    Filed: 04/04/2022
    VIRNETX INC.   v. HIRSHFELD                               3
    (2) The June 12, 2017 final written decision of the Pa-
    tent Trial and Appeal Board in IPR2016-00957 is vacated,
    and Appeal No. 2017-2594 is remanded with instructions
    to dismiss.
    (3) Each side to bear its own costs as to Appeal No.
    2017-2594.
    (4) No additional docketing fee is required for the
    amended notice of appeal in Appeal No. 2017-2593.
    (5) The revised certified list in Appeal No. 2017-2593
    is due no later than April 19, 2022. VirnetX’s opening brief
    is due within 60 days of the date of filing of the certified
    list.
    FOR THE COURT
    April 4, 2022                      /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner
    Date                            Peter R. Marksteiner
    Clerk of Court
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 17-2593

Filed Date: 4/4/2022

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/4/2022