Campbell v. Opm ( 2022 )


Menu:
  • Case: 22-1255    Document: 10     Page: 1    Filed: 04/05/2022
    NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.
    United States Court of Appeals
    for the Federal Circuit
    ______________________
    IRENE D. CAMPBELL,
    Petitioner
    v.
    OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT,
    Respondent
    ______________________
    2022-1255
    ______________________
    Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection
    Board in No. AT-844E-21-0048-I-1.
    ______________________
    Before PROST, REYNA, and CUNNINGHAM, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM.
    ORDER
    In response to the court’s February 3, 2022 order to
    show cause, the Office of Personnel Management urges dis-
    missal of this petition for review as untimely. Irene D.
    Campbell has not responded.
    Ms. Campbell filed an appeal at the Merit Systems Pro-
    tection Board seeking review of the denial of her applica-
    tion for disability retirement. On April 7, 2021, the
    administrative judge (AJ) issued an initial decision affirm-
    ing the Office of Personnel Management’s decision. That
    Case: 22-1255     Document: 10     Page: 2     Filed: 04/05/2022
    2                                             CAMPBELL   v. OPM
    decision became the final decision of the Board on May 12,
    2021, because Ms. Campbell did not seek further review at
    the Board. This court received Ms. Campbell’s petition for
    review 211 days later, on December 9, 2021.
    Section 7703(b)(1)(A) of title 5 of the U.S. Code states
    that a petition for review from the Board “shall be filed
    within 60 days after the Board issues notice of the final or-
    der or decision of the Board.” 
    5 U.S.C. § 7703
    (b)(1)(A). This
    court has held that section 7703(b)(1)(A)’s deadline is juris-
    dictional and not subject to equitable tolling. See Fedora v.
    Merit Sys. Prot. Bd., 
    848 F.3d 1013
    , 1016 (Fed. Cir. 2017)
    (confirming that § 7703(b)(1)(A)’s deadline is jurisdic-
    tional). Thus, we may only consider whether the petition
    for review was timely filed. Ms. Campbell’s petition here
    was received outside of the 60-day filing deadline, and we
    therefore must dismiss.
    Accordingly,
    IT IS ORDERED THAT:
    (1) The petition for review is dismissed.
    (2) Each side shall bear its own costs.
    FOR THE COURT
    April 5, 2022                       /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner
    Date                           Peter R. Marksteiner
    Clerk of Court
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 22-1255

Filed Date: 4/5/2022

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/13/2022