M2m Solutions LLC v. Sierra Wireless America, Inc. ( 2022 )


Menu:
  • Case: 22-1437   Document: 9     Page: 1   Filed: 04/19/2022
    NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.
    United States Court of Appeals
    for the Federal Circuit
    ______________________
    M2M SOLUTIONS LLC,
    Plaintiff
    BLACKBIRD TECH LLC, dba Blackbird Technolo-
    gies,
    Plaintiff-Appellant
    v.
    SIERRA WIRELESS AMERICA, INC., SIERRA
    WIRELESS, INC.,
    Defendants-Appellees
    ______________________
    2022-1437
    ______________________
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the
    District of Delaware in No. 1:14-cv-01102-RGA, Judge
    Richard G. Andrews.
    ______________________
    ON MOTION
    ______________________
    Before PROST, REYNA, and CUNNINGHAM, Circuit Judges.
    CUNNINGHAM, Circuit Judge.
    Case: 22-1437      Document: 9    Page: 2    Filed: 04/19/2022
    2       M2M SOLUTIONS LLC    v. SIERRA WIRELESS AMERICA, INC.
    ORDER
    Appellant Blackbird Tech LLC, d/b/a Blackbird Tech-
    nologies (“Blackbird”) states that “the filing of this appeal
    may have been premature” and thus moves unopposed to
    voluntarily dismiss its appeal under Federal Rule of Appel-
    late Procedure 42(b). Blackbird further requests that if its
    appeal is premature, no additional filing fees be required
    for filing a subsequent appeal.
    Blackbird appeals from the district court’s January 3,
    2022, decision granting Sierra Wireless America, Inc. and
    Sierra Wireless Inc.’s motion for attorney fees pursuant to
    
    35 U.S.C. § 285
    . Neither that decision nor any subsequent
    filing has yet quantified the amount of the attorney fees,
    however, and “[w]e lack jurisdiction over the unquantified
    attorney’s fees decision.” Elbit Sys. Land & C4I Ltd. v.
    Hughes Network Sys., LLC, 
    927 F.3d 1292
    , 1294 (Fed. Cir.
    2019). This appeal thus is premature, though we will allow
    it to be reinstated under the same docket number, without
    the payment of an additional filing fee, if, within 60 days of
    this order, Blackbird appeals from the entry of a final at-
    torney fees award.
    Accordingly,
    IT IS ORDERED THAT:
    (1) The motion is granted to the extent that the appeal
    is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction, subject, however, to re-
    instatement under the same docket number, without pay-
    ment of any additional filing fee, if, within 60 days of this
    order, Blackbird appeals from the entry of a final attorney
    fees award. The mandate shall issue simultaneously with
    this order.
    Case: 22-1437    Document: 9     Page: 3      Filed: 04/19/2022
    M2M SOLUTIONS LLC   v. SIERRA WIRELESS AMERICA, INC.        3
    (2) Each side shall bear its own costs.
    FOR THE COURT
    April 19, 2022                     /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner
    Date                          Peter R. Marksteiner
    Clerk of Court
    ISSUED AS A MANDATE: April 19, 2022
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 22-1437

Filed Date: 4/19/2022

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/19/2022