Patel v. United States ( 2023 )


Menu:
  • Case: 23-1323    Document: 15     Page: 1   Filed: 04/21/2023
    NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.
    United States Court of Appeals
    for the Federal Circuit
    ______________________
    RAJ K. PATEL,
    Plaintiff-Appellant
    v.
    UNITED STATES,
    Defendant-Appellee
    ______________________
    2023-1323
    ______________________
    Appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims
    in No. 1:22-cv-00734-LAS, Senior Judge Loren A. Smith.
    ______________________
    PER CURIAM.
    ORDER
    Raj K. Patel appeals from the United States Court of
    Federal Claims’ August 12, 2022, judgment dismissing his
    complaint. In response to the court’s March 2, 2023, show
    cause order, the United States urges dismissal of this ap-
    peal as untimely. Mr. Patel “move[s] . . . to allow the
    Case: 23-1323     Document: 15      Page: 2    Filed: 04/21/2023
    2                                                  PATEL   v. US
    appeal,” ECF No. 13 at 1, and suggests that this case may
    be consolidated with Appeal No. 2023-1325. *
    The timely filing of a notice of appeal from the Court of
    Federal Claims is “a jurisdictional requirement” and “not
    subject to equitable tolling.” Marandola v. United States,
    
    518 F.3d 913
    , 914 (Fed. Cir. 2008) (citation omitted). To be
    timely, a notice of appeal must be received by the Court of
    Federal Claims within 60 days after the entry of final judg-
    ment. See 
    28 U.S.C. §§ 2107
    , 2522; Fed. R. App. P.
    4(a)(1)(B); Fed. Cir. R. 1(a)(1)(C). In this case, it is undis-
    puted that Mr. Patel’s notice of appeal was filed 137 days
    after final judgment. Thus, we lack jurisdiction over Mr.
    Patel’s untimely appeal. To the extent that Mr. Patel’s re-
    sponse argues that this appeal can be deemed timely based
    on this court’s jurisdiction over his separate appeal involv-
    ing a different underlying case, we must reject that argu-
    ment at least because his notice of appeal in that case filed
    on December 21, 2022, was likewise not filed within 60
    days of entry of final judgment in this case.
    Accordingly,
    IT IS ORDERED THAT:
    (1) The appeal is dismissed.
    (2) Each side shall bear its own costs.
    FOR THE COURT
    April 21, 2023                      /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner
    Date                           Peter R. Marksteiner
    Clerk of Court
    *  The court notes that it granted the United States’
    motion for summary affirmance in Appeal No. 2023-1325
    on March 7, 2023.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 23-1323

Filed Date: 4/21/2023

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/21/2023