Power Management Solutions v. Qualcomm Incorporated ( 2014 )

Case: 13-1477 Document: 27 Page: 1 Filed: 04/16/2014 NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ POWER MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. QUALCOMM INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellee. ______________________ 2013-1477 ______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in No. 13-CV-0130, Judge Richard G. Andrews. ______________________ ON MOTION ______________________ Before PROST, O’MALLEY and TARANTO, Circuit Judge. TARANTO, Circuit Judge. ORDER The parties jointly move to affirm the judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Delaware. In addition to the complaint giving rise to this appeal, Power Management Solutions LLC brought three other Case: 13-1477 Document: 27 Page: 2 Filed: 04/16/2014 2 POWER MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS v. QUALCOMM INCORPORATED relevant complaints in the District of Delaware, asserting infringement of U.S. Patent No. 5,504,909. See Power Management Solutions LLC v. Advanced Micro Devices Inc., No. 2013-1455; Power Management Solutions LLC v. NVIDIA Corp., No. 2013-1456; and Power Management Solutions LLC v. Intel Corp. et al., No. 2013-1457 (collec- tively, the “Related Cases”). In all three Related Cases, the district court entered a stipulated judgment of nonin- fringement, allowing Power Management to appeal from adverse claim construction rulings. In August 2013, while the Related Cases were on ap- peal, the parties jointly moved to stay proceedings in this case. The parties stipulated that, if this court were to affirm the judgments in the Related Cases, this court should affirm the judgment in this appeal. We granted the parties’ motion to stay this appeal pending final disposition of the Related Cases. Now that this court has affirmed the judgments of the district court in the Related Cases and the mandates have issued, we summarily affirm the judgment of the district court in this case. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT: (1) The motion is granted. The judgment of the Dis- trict Court for the District of Delaware is affirmed. (2) Each side shall bear its own costs. FOR THE COURT /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court s19 ISSUED AS A MANDATE: April 16, 2014