Sabinsa Corp. v. Herbakraft, Inc. ( 2023 )


Menu:
  • Case: 23-2002   Document: 7      Page: 1   Filed: 10/20/2023
    NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.
    United States Court of Appeals
    for the Federal Circuit
    ______________________
    SABINSA CORP.,
    Plaintiff-Appellee
    v.
    HERBAKRAFT, INC.,
    Defendant
    PRAKRUTI PRODUCTS PVT. LTD.,
    Defendant-Appellant
    ______________________
    2023-2002
    ______________________
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the
    District of New Jersey in No. 1:14-cv-04738-RBK-SAK,
    Senior Judge Robert B. Kugler.
    ______________________
    Before DYK, CUNNINGHAM, and STARK, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM.
    ORDER
    Following this court’s show cause order directing the
    parties to address whether this appeal should be dismissed
    for lack of jurisdiction, we dismiss.
    The district court sanctioned Prakruti Products PVT.
    Ltd. (“Prakruti”) for discovery misconduct. The court
    Case: 23-2002      Document: 7    Page: 2    Filed: 10/20/2023
    2                          SABINSA CORP. v. HERBAKRAFT, INC.
    thereafter held Prakruti in “civil contempt” for failing to
    comply with the sanctions order, directed the clerk of court
    to enter default, and scheduled briefing on default judg-
    ment. Prakruti filed this appeal, even though the motion
    for default judgment remains pending.
    In general, we only have jurisdiction to review a “final
    decision” from district court, 
    28 U.S.C. § 1295
    (a)(1)—one
    that “ends the litigation on the merits and leaves nothing
    for the court to do but execute the judgment.” Catlin v.
    United States, 
    324 U.S. 229
    , 233 (1945). Here, Prakruti
    does not appeal from such a decision. “[C]ivil contempt or-
    ders [against parties] are not final judgments, even when a
    fine is assessed,” Entegris, Inc. v. Pall Corp., 
    490 F.3d 1340
    ,
    1347–48 (Fed. Cir. 2007), and “the entry of default is an
    ‘interlocutory act and, as such, a non-final order.’” City of
    New York v. Mickalis Pawn Shop, LLC, 
    645 F.3d 114
    , 128
    n.15 (2d Cir. 2011) (citation omitted).
    Accordingly,
    IT IS ORDERED THAT:
    (1) The appeal is dismissed.
    (2) Each party shall bear its own costs.
    FOR THE COURT
    October 20, 2023                         /s/ Jarrett B. Perlow
    Date                                Jarrett B. Perlow
    Clerk of Court
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 23-2002

Filed Date: 10/20/2023

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/20/2023