In Re GURVEY ( 2023 )


Menu:
  • Case: 23-134    Document: 16     Page: 1    Filed: 08/16/2023
    NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.
    United States Court of Appeals
    for the Federal Circuit
    ______________________
    In re: AMY R. GURVEY,
    Petitioner
    ______________________
    2023-134
    ______________________
    On Petition for Writ of Mandamus to the United States
    District Court for the Southern District of New York in No.
    1:06-cv-01202-LGS-HBP, Judge Lorna G. Schofield.
    ______________________
    ON PETITION
    ______________________
    PER CURIAM.
    ORDER
    Amy R. Gurvey petitions for a writ of mandamus to
    “disqualif[y]” the magistrate judge and district court judge,
    vacate the district court’s orders “retroactive to 2012,” and
    direct that her case be transferred. ECF No. 2-1 at 21–22.
    The district court entered final judgment against Ms.
    Gurvey in 2017. She appealed to the United States Court
    of Appeals for the Second Circuit, which affirmed in 2018.
    In 2020 and 2021, the district court denied Ms. Gurvey’s
    requests to vacate the judgment. We transferred her ap-
    peals from those rulings (and her associated petition for a
    writ of mandamus) to the Second Circuit, which dismissed
    Case: 23-134    Document: 16      Page: 2    Filed: 08/16/2023
    2                                               IN RE: GURVEY
    them. In 2022, the district court entered an anti-filing in-
    junction against Ms. Gurvey. This petition appears to arise
    out of Ms. Gurvey’s recent attempts to file submissions at
    the district court seeking disqualification and vacatur of
    the prior rulings, which have been returned to her unadju-
    dicated.
    The All Writs Act provides that the federal courts “may
    issue all writs necessary or appropriate in aid of their re-
    spective jurisdictions and agreeable to the usages and prin-
    ciples of law.” 
    28 U.S.C. § 1651
    (a). As that statute makes
    clear, however, the Act is not itself a grant of jurisdiction.
    See Clinton v. Goldsmith, 
    526 U.S. 529
    , 534–35 (1999). As
    we have repeatedly explained to Ms. Gurvey, we do not
    have jurisdiction over her case. See 
    28 U.S.C. § 1295
    . Un-
    der the circumstances, we dismiss, having concluded that
    it would not be in the interest of justice to transfer to the
    Second Circuit under 
    28 U.S.C. § 1631
    .
    Accordingly,
    IT IS ORDERED THAT:
    The petition is dismissed.
    FOR THE COURT
    August 16, 2023                         /s/ Jarrett B. Perlow
    Date                                Jarrett B. Perlow
    Clerk of Court
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 23-134

Filed Date: 8/16/2023

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 9/13/2023