Oram v. MSPB ( 2022 )


Menu:
  • Case: 22-1736    Document: 15     Page: 1   Filed: 08/29/2022
    NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.
    United States Court of Appeals
    for the Federal Circuit
    ______________________
    CYRIL D. ORAM, JR.,
    Petitioner
    v.
    MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD,
    Respondent
    ______________________
    2022-1736
    ______________________
    Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection
    Board in No. DC-4324-21-0450-I-1.
    ______________________
    Before LOURIE, CHEN, and STARK, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM.
    ORDER
    In response to the court’s June 27, 2022 order to show
    cause, the Merit Systems Protection Board urges dismissal
    of Cyril D. Oram, Jr.’s petition for review as premature.
    Mr. Oram has not filed a response.
    Mr. Oram filed an appeal at the Board from a decision
    of the Department of the Air Force withdrawing a job offer.
    At Mr. Oram’s request, the administrative judge on Janu-
    ary 19, 2022 issued an order dismissing the appeal without
    prejudice to refiling by April 20, 2022. On April 20, 2022,
    Case: 22-1736      Document: 15    Page: 2     Filed: 08/29/2022
    2                                               ORAM   v. MSPB
    Mr. Oram refiled his appeal. On April 23, 2022, this court
    received Mr. Oram’s petition to review the January 19,
    2022 order. Since the docketing of this petition, the admin-
    istrative judge has granted Mr. Oram’s second request to
    dismiss without prejudice, subject to automatic refiling “on
    or about October 10, 2022.” ECF No. 14, Appx 17–18.
    This court’s review of Board decisions is limited to final
    orders or final decisions. See 
    28 U.S.C. § 1295
    (a)(9); see
    also Weed v. Soc. Sec. Admin., 
    571 F.3d 1359
    , 1361 (Fed.
    Cir. 2009). Board dismissals without prejudice are not fi-
    nal for purposes of judicial review in cases such as this
    where the petitioner requests the dismissal and the Board
    leaves the option of refiling. See Strausbaugh v. Merit Sys.
    Prot. Bd., 401 F. App’x 524, 526 (Fed. Cir. 2010). We there-
    fore dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. Mr. Oram may petition
    this court for review after issuance of a final decision.
    Accordingly,
    IT IS ORDERED THAT:
    (1) The petition for review is dismissed.
    (2) Each side shall bear its own costs.
    FOR THE COURT
    August 29, 2022                     /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner
    Date                           Peter R. Marksteiner
    Clerk of Court
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 22-1736

Filed Date: 8/29/2022

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 9/12/2022