King v. McDonough ( 2023 )


Menu:
  • Case: 23-2291    Document: 11     Page: 1    Filed: 12/14/2023
    NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.
    United States Court of Appeals
    for the Federal Circuit
    ______________________
    WENDY KING,
    Claimant-Appellant
    v.
    DENIS MCDONOUGH, Secretary of Veterans
    Affairs,
    Respondent-Appellee
    ______________________
    2023-2291
    ______________________
    Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for
    Veterans Claims in No. 21-6310, Judge Joseph L. Falvey,
    Jr.
    ______________________
    Before PROST, HUGHES, and STOLL, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM.
    ORDER
    In response to this court’s September 20, 2023, show
    cause order, the Secretary of Veterans Affairs urges dis-
    missal of the appeal as untimely. Wendy King responds,
    urging the court not to dismiss because she “told the attor-
    ney [she] wanted to continue but he did not respond,” ECF
    No. 8 at 2.
    Case: 23-2291     Document: 11      Page: 2    Filed: 12/14/2023
    2                                         KING v. MCDONOUGH
    The United States Court of Appeals for Veterans
    Claims entered judgment in this case on March 28, 2023.
    The Veterans Court received Ms. King’s notice of appeal
    115 days later on July 21, 2023.
    To be timely, a notice of appeal must be received by the
    Veterans Court within 60 days of the entry of judgment.
    See 
    38 U.S.C. § 7292
    (a); see also 
    28 U.S.C. § 2107
    (b); Fed.
    R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(B); Fed. Cir. R. 1(a)(1)(D). Like appeals
    from district courts, the statutorily prescribed time for fil-
    ing appeals from the Veterans Court to this court is man-
    datory and jurisdictional, meaning that we cannot take
    account of individual circumstances for the untimely filing.
    See Wagner v. Shinseki, 
    733 F.3d 1343
    , 1348 (Fed. Cir.
    2013); see also Henderson v. Shinseki, 
    562 U.S. 428
    , 438–
    39 (2011) (indicating jurisdictional restrictions on the time
    for taking an appeal under section 7292(a)). Because Ms.
    King’s notice of appeal was not filed within 60 days of the
    final judgment of the Veterans Court, * we must dismiss the
    appeal.
    Accordingly,
    *     On June 30, 2023, Ms. King filed at the Veterans
    Court a motion for an extension of time, see ECF No. 9, but
    that court did not act on the extension motion, which was
    not filed within the time window in which such a motion
    could be granted. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5)(A) (“The district
    court may extend the time to file a notice of appeal if . . . a
    party so moves no later than 30 days after the time pre-
    scribed by this Rule 4(a) expires.”); 
    28 U.S.C. § 2107
    (c); 
    38 U.S.C. § 7292
    (a) (providing that appeals from the Veterans
    Court “shall be obtained by filing a notice of appeal . . .
    within the time and in the manner prescribed for appeal
    . . . from United States district courts”).
    Case: 23-2291   Document: 11       Page: 3    Filed: 12/14/2023
    KING v. MCDONOUGH                                          3
    IT IS ORDERED THAT:
    (1) The appeal is dismissed.
    (2) Each side shall bear its own costs.
    FOR THE COURT
    December 14, 2023
    Date
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 23-2291

Filed Date: 12/14/2023

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 12/14/2023