In Re: Engleman ( 2014 )

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ IN RE EDGAR G. ENGLEMAN, RONALD LEVY, FRANK J. HSU AND CLAUDIA BENIKE. ______________________ 2014-1230 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Serial No. 08/575,432. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ VICKI S. VEENKER, Veenker Law Offices, of Palo Alto, California, argued for appellants. With her on the brief were DAVID A. ROISE, VLP Law Group LLP, of Palo Alto, California; and WILLIAM R. ZIMMERMAN and JONATHAN E. BACHAND, Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP, of Wash- ington, DC. KRISTI L. R. SAWERT, Associate Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of Alexandria, Virginia argued for appellee. With her on the brief were NATHAN K. KELLEY, Solicitor, and JAMIE L. SIMPSON, Associate Solicitor. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (DYK, REYNA, and HUGHES, Circuit Judg- es). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT December 4, 2014 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court