-
This is an appeal from that portion of a final judgment decreeing a divorce between the parties to this action. The facts of the case are fully set forth in the case ofBancroft v. Bancroft, ante, p. 352, [
173 P. 582 ]. The matters upon which the appellant predicates her right to a reversal herein occurred prior to the inception of the action, and were, therefore, the subject of review upon an appeal from the interlocutory *Page 367 decree had such appeal been taken, and hence cannot be made the subject of review upon an appeal from the final decree. (Code Civ. Proc., sec. 956; Claudius v. Melvin,146 Cal. 257 , [79 P. 897 ]; Suttman v. Superior Court,174 Cal. 243 , [162 P. 1032 ]; Newell v. Superior Court,27 Cal. App. 343 , [149 P. 998 ]; Reed v. Reed,9 Cal. App. 748 , [100 P. 897 ].) In addition to this, however, the points discussed upon this appeal have been decided adversely to the appellant's contention in the case of Bancroft v. Bancroft ante, p. 359, [173 P. 579 ], and upon the conclusions arrived at in that decision the portion of the judgment herein appealed from is affirmed.
Document Info
Docket Number: L. A. No. 5411. In Bank.
Judges: THE COURT.
Filed Date: 6/3/1918
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/2/2024