Heinlen v. Martin , 53 Cal. 321 ( 1879 )


Menu:
  • Rhodes, J., dissenting:

    I would readily concur in several of the propositions discussed in the foregoing opinion, if, in my judgment, they were presented by the record; but as I view the case, the contract which is specifically enforced is not pleaded, and its introduction in evidence was objected to by the defendants. I therefore dissent from the opinion and judgment.

    Wallace, C. J., being disqualified, did not participate in the decision.

Document Info

Docket Number: No. 4150

Citation Numbers: 53 Cal. 321

Judges: Rhodes

Filed Date: 7/1/1879

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024