-
Per Curiam. The respondents’ proposition in this case is, that money earned by a wife may be taken for the debt of her husband. The question is solved by a provision of the Code not referred to by counsel on either side. It is section 168 of the Civil Code, and reads: “ The earnings of the wife are not liable for the debts of the husband.”
That part of the judgment appealed from, together with the order denying the motion for a new trial, reversed, and cause remanded,
Document Info
Citation Numbers: 63 Cal. 390, 1883 Cal. LEXIS 471
Filed Date: 5/11/1883
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/2/2024