People ex rel. Robarts v. Beaudry , 91 Cal. 213 ( 1891 )

Paterson, J., concurring.

It is unnecessary to determine in this action whether a judgment entered in an action between the city and an individual is a bar to an action by the people against another or the same defendant, where the question at issue in each case is, whether the land in controversy has been dedicated to public use as a street. The judgment referred to in the foregoing opinion was admissible, because it was one of the muniments of defendants’ title.

Hearing in Bank denied.