People v. Vargas CA6 ( 2021 )


Menu:
  • Filed 4/23/21 P. v. Vargas CA6
    NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
    California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for
    publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication
    or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
    IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
    SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
    THE PEOPLE,                                                         H048350
    (Monterey County
    Plaintiff and Respondent,                                 Super. Ct. No. 18CR005670)
    v.
    BENJAMIN TRUJILLO VARGAS,
    Defendant and Appellant.
    Defendant Benjamin Trujillo Vargas appeals from the judgment entered following
    his admission that he violated probation. Appointed counsel filed an opening brief
    summarizing the case but raising no issues. Counsel notified defendant of his right to file
    a supplemental brief on his own behalf and defendant has not done so. Having reviewed
    the entire record, we see no arguable appellate issue. We therefore briefly describe the
    proceedings and then affirm the judgment. (See People v. Wende (1979) 
    25 Cal.3d 436
    ,
    440–441; People v. Kelly (2006) 
    40 Cal.4th 106
    , 110.)
    Defendant pleaded no contest in 2018 to possessing a controlled substance for sale
    (Health & Saf. Code, § 11351) and possessing a short-barreled rifle or shotgun (Pen.
    Code, § 33215). He was granted probation with conditions including 180 days in county
    jail. In February 2020, the District Attorney alleged defendant violated his probation by
    smoking marijuana in a public place (in violation of Health and Saf. Code, § 11362.3).
    Defendant admitted the violation and the court terminated probation. Defendant was
    sentenced to the middle term of three years on the possession for sale count and the
    middle term of two years for the firearm possession, to be served concurrently (with 381
    days of custody credit). The court imposed a $600 restitution fund fine and, because
    probation had been revoked, ordered payment of a previously suspended $600 probation
    revocation fine.
    Defendant timely filed a notice of appeal on his own behalf.
    DISPOSITION
    The judgment is affirmed.
    2
    ____________________________________
    Grover, J.
    WE CONCUR:
    ____________________________
    Greenwood, P. J.
    ____________________________
    Danner, J.
    H048350 - The People v. Vargas
    

Document Info

Docket Number: H048350

Filed Date: 4/23/2021

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/23/2021