McMillin Companies v. American Safety Indemnity CA4/1 ( 2015 )


Menu:
  • Filed 1/22/15 McMillin Companies v. American Safety Indemnity CA4/1
    NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
    California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for
    publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication
    or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
    COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
    DIVISION ONE
    STATE OF CALIFORNIA
    MCMILLIN COMPANIES, LLC,                                             D065298
    Plaintiffs and Respondents,
    v.                                                          (Super. Ct. No. 37-2009-00083837-
    CU-IC-CTL)
    AMERICAN SAFETY INDEMNITY
    COMPANY,
    Defendant and Respondent.
    APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Judith F.
    Hayes, Judge. Appeal dismissed.
    Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker, Gregory D. Hagen and John R.
    Clifford for Defendant and Appellant.
    Law Offices of Greg J. Ryan, Greg J. Ryan and Debbie H. Kim for Plaintiffs and
    Respondents.
    Defendant American Safety Indemnity Company (ASIC) appeals from a
    postjudgment order of the superior court granting a motion to strike ASIC's memorandum
    of costs ("Order"). The judgment that preceded ASIC's memorandum is the subject of
    another appeal in this court, decided this same date, McMillin Cos., LLC v. American
    Safety Indemnity Co., No. D063586 (D063586). In D063586, we reversed the judgment.
    An order denying costs " 'falls with a reversal of the judgment on which it is
    based.' " (Allen v. Smith (2002) 
    94 Cal. App. 4th 1270
    , 1284.) That is because costs on
    appeal "are merely incidental to the judgment appealed from." (Purdy v. Johnson (1929)
    
    100 Cal. App. 416
    , 420-421.) Indeed, in its opening brief, ASIC acknowledges that its
    right to obtain costs may be impacted by the disposition of D063586.
    Accordingly, ASIC's appeal from the Order is moot and must be dismissed.
    (Evans v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co. (1989) 
    213 Cal. App. 3d 1378
    , 1388.)
    DISPOSITION
    The appeal is dismissed. In the interests of justice, the parties will bear their
    respective costs on appeal. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.278(a)(5).)
    IRION, J.
    WE CONCUR:
    NARES, Acting P. J.
    AARON, J.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: D065298

Filed Date: 1/22/2015

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/18/2021