People v. Doung CA2/4 ( 2022 )


Menu:
  •  Filed 2/22/22 P. v. Doung CA2/4
    NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
    California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not
    certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(a). This opinion has not
    been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115(a).
    IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
    SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
    DIVISION FOUR
    THE PEOPLE,                                                  B313766
    Plaintiff and Respondent,                             Los Angeles County
    Super. Ct. No. BA230370
    v.
    MAN COOC DOUNG,
    Defendant and Appellant.
    APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los
    Angeles County, David V. Herriford, Judge. Dismissed.
    Richard B. Lennon and Cheryl Lutz under appointment by
    the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
    No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.
    In August 2002, defendant and appellant Man Cooc Doung
    was convicted of second-degree murder. (Pen. Code, § 187, subd.
    (a).) In May 2003, the trial court sentenced Doung to a term of 15
    years to life, and imposed a restitution fine of $10,000 under
    Penal Code section 1202.4, subdivision (b). In 2009 and 2010, the
    trial court denied Doung’s requests to modify the amount of
    restitution imposed. On June 9, 2021, Doung again filed a motion
    to modify his sentence, arguing the trial court improperly failed
    to consider that he had no ability to pay the restitution fine. The
    trial court denied the motion on several grounds, including:
    Doung failed to object to the fine at trial or in his original appeal;
    he had not challenged the fine in a timely manner; he had not
    established he could not pay the fine; and the court had no
    jurisdiction to modify the fine. Doung timely appealed.
    Appellate counsel filed a brief identifying no issues and
    requesting that this court follow the procedures set forth in
    People v. Serrano (2012) 
    211 Cal.App.4th 496
    . The court notified
    Doung he had 30 days to file a supplemental brief. Doung did not
    file a supplemental brief. This court has no independent duty to
    review the record for reasonably arguable issues. (People v. Cole
    (2020) 
    52 Cal.App.5th 1023
    , 1039-1040, review granted Oct. 14,
    2020, S264278.) We therefore dismiss Doung’s appeal as
    abandoned. (Ibid.)
    2
    DISPOSITION
    The appeal is dismissed.
    NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
    CURREY, J.
    We concur:
    MANELLA, P.J.
    COLLINS, J.
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: B313766

Filed Date: 2/22/2022

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 2/22/2022