In re R v. CA4/3 ( 2015 )


Menu:
  • Filed 12/3/15 In re R.V. CA4/3
    NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
    California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for
    publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication
    or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
    IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
    FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
    DIVISION THREE
    In re R.V., a Person Coming Under the
    Juvenile Court Law.
    THE PEOPLE,
    G046961
    Plaintiff and Respondent,
    (Super. Ct. No. DL034139)
    v.
    OPINION
    R.V.,
    Defendant and Appellant.
    Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Orange County, Deborah
    C. Servino, Judge. Judgment reversed.
    Cindy Brines, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant
    and Appellant.
    Kamala D. Harris, Attorney General, Dane R. Gillette, Chief Assistant
    Attorney General, Julie L. Garland, Assistant Attorney General, Melissa Mandel, and
    Kathryn Kirschbaum, Deputy Attorneys General for Plaintiff and Respondent.
    *               *               *
    Alleging the juvenile court erred by finding him competent to be
    adjudicated under Welfare and Institutions Code section 602, minor R.V. appealed from
    the court’s judgment declaring him a ward of the juvenile court and placing him on
    probation. We affirmed the judgment, concluding minor bore the burden of proving his
    incompetency and that substantial evidence supported the juvenile court’s determination
    minor was competent to proceed. The California Supreme Court reversed our judgment,
    holding (1) minor bore the burden of proving his incompetency, (2) the substantial
    evidence standard of review applied to the juvenile court’s determination minor was
    competent, and (3) “the weight and the character of the evidence of incompetency was
    such that the juvenile court could not reasonably reject it.” (In re R.V. (2015) 
    61 Cal. 4th 181
    , 186, 201.) We therefore reverse the juvenile court’s judgment and remand
    for further proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court’s opinion.
    IKOLA, J.
    WE CONCUR:
    RYLAARSDAM, ACTING P. J.
    THOMPSON, J.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: G046961

Filed Date: 12/3/2015

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/18/2021