People v. Good CA2/6 ( 2015 )


Menu:
  • Filed 12/28/15 P. v. Good CA2/6
    NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
    California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for
    publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication
    or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
    IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
    SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
    DIVISION SIX
    THE PEOPLE,                                                                  2d Crim. No. B257767
    (Super. Ct. No. 2013006181)
    Plaintiff and Respondent,                                                 (Ventura County)
    v.
    JOAN GAYLE GOOD,
    Defendant and Appellant.
    Joan Gayle Good was charged with grand theft. (Pen. Code, § 487, subd.
    (a).) She pled guilty after waiving a preliminary hearing and her trial rights. The trial
    court sentenced her to three years of probation subject to various terms and conditions,
    including a 120-day jail term, which it stayed. Good was awarded nine days of
    presentence custody credit. The trial court granted her request for a certificate of
    1
    probable cause based on alleged ineffective assistance of counsel in the plea. (Id.,
    § 1237.5; Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.304(b).)
    1
    Before the trial court held a restitution hearing, Good requested a second
    certificate of probable cause, which the trial court granted, to challenge her sentence, her
    conditions of probation, and the anticipated restitution order. We consider these issues in
    a separately filed opinion.
    Appointed counsel filed a brief raising no issues and requesting our
    independent review pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 
    25 Cal. 3d 436
    . On December 9,
    2014, we notified Good that she had 30 days in which to advise us of any claims she
    wished us to consider. No response has been received.
    We have reviewed the entire record and are satisfied that Good's
    attorney has fully complied with his responsibilities and that no arguable issues exist.
    (People v. Kelly (2006) 
    40 Cal. 4th 106
    , 123-124; People v. 
    Wende, supra
    , 25 Cal.3d at
    pp. 441-442.)
    The judgment is affirmed.
    NOT TO BE PUBLISHED.
    PERREN, J.
    We concur:
    GILBERT, P. J.
    YEGAN, J.
    2
    Kent Kellegrew, Judge
    Superior Court County of Ventura
    ______________________________
    California Appellate Project, Jonathan B. Steiner and Richard B. Lennon,
    under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
    No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: B257767

Filed Date: 12/28/2015

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 12/28/2015