Bagley v. Lilienthal ( 1912 )

This case involves the same questions as Bagley v. Bloom etal. (No. 1041), ante, p. 255, [125 P. 931], and for the reasons stated in the opinion this day filed therein, the judgment is affirmed.

Lennon, P. J., and Kerrigan, J., concurred.

A petition to have the cause heard in the supreme court, after judgment in the district court of appeal, was denied by the supreme court on August 14, 1912.