In re J.B. CA4/2 ( 2013 )


Menu:
  • Filed 12/19/13 In re J.B. CA4/2
    NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
    California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for
    publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication
    or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
    IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
    FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
    DIVISION TWO
    In re J.B., a Person Coming Under the
    Juvenile Court Law.
    THE PEOPLE,
    E059375
    Plaintiff and Respondent,
    (Super.Ct.No. INJ1300145)
    v.
    OPINION
    J.B.,
    Defendant and Appellant.
    APPEAL from the Superior Court of Riverside County. Lawrence P. Best,
    Temporary Judge. (Pursuant to Cal. Const., art. VI, § 21.) Affirmed.
    John N. Aquilina, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and
    Appellant.
    No appearance by Plaintiff and Respondent.
    1
    The minor J.B. was placed on informal probation for six months in his parents’
    custody for tripping and pushing another sixth-grade boy five times in succession. As
    discussed below, we affirm the juvenile court’s jurisdiction and disposition orders.
    FACTS AND PROCEDURE
    On November 2, 2012, the minor and another boy approached the victim before
    school in the quadrangle of their middle school. The minor told the other boy that it
    would be funny if they messed around with the victim. The minor put his foot in front of
    the victim’s feet and then pushed him. The victim tripped and fell forward onto his knees
    on the grass. He used his right arm to avoid falling flat on the ground. The victim
    attempted to leave—he “tried to walk away and he kept doing it.” The minor giggled and
    tripped the victim in this manner “at least five times.” The other boy then picked up the
    victim and threw him onto the ground. The victim suffered a broken right wrist and
    bruised ribs.
    The minor was interviewed by a sheriff’s deputy after he returned to school from a
    suspension. He stated that he tripped the victim about three times in order to help him
    with his balance, because the victim fell often. The minor testified at the jurisdiction
    hearing that he helped the victim go to the office after the incident, and that he tripped the
    victim only two times. The victim testified that the minor did not come with him to the
    office and that he and the minor were not friends.
    On April 16, 2013, the People filed a juvenile delinquency petition regarding the
    minor pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code, section 602. The People alleged the
    minor committed felony assault by means of force likely to produce great bodily injury.
    2
    (Pen. Code, § 245, subd. (a).) The minor’s mother told the probation officer that she was
    upset the minor had been charged because he was only trying to help the victim avoid
    being bullied by other children.
    The jurisdiction hearing was held on August 6, 2013. The juvenile court heard
    testimony from the victim, a sheriff’s deputy and the minor. At the conclusion of the
    hearing, the court found true that the minor had committed the lesser included offense of
    misdemeanor assault. Although the probation officer had recommended formal
    probation, the juvenile court ordered the minor to be placed on informal probation for six
    months in the custody of his parents. This appeal followed.
    DISCUSSION
    After minor appealed, and upon his request, this court appointed counsel to
    represent him. Counsel has filed a brief under the authority of People v. Wende (1979)
    
    25 Cal.3d 436
     and Anders v. California (1967) 
    386 U.S. 738
     setting forth a statement of
    the case, a summary of the facts, and potential arguable issues, and requesting this court
    to undertake a review of the entire record.
    We offered minor an opportunity to file a personal supplemental brief, but he has
    not done so. Pursuant to the mandate of People v. Kelly (2006) 
    40 Cal.4th 106
    , we have
    conducted an independent review of the record and find no arguable issues.
    3
    DISPOSITION
    The judgment is affirmed.
    NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
    RAMIREZ
    P. J.
    We concur:
    HOLLENHORST
    J.
    CODRINGTON
    J.
    4
    

Document Info

Docket Number: E059375

Filed Date: 12/19/2013

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/18/2021