People v. Sanders CA4/1 ( 2015 )


Menu:
  • Filed 3/24/15 P. v. Sanders CA4/1
    NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
    California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for
    publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication
    or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
    COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
    DIVISION ONE
    STATE OF CALIFORNIA
    THE PEOPLE,                                                         D064743
    Plaintiff and Respondent,
    v.                                                         (Super. Ct. No. SCD235740)
    STEPHEN CHARLES SANDERS,
    Defendant and Appellant.
    APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Robert F.
    O'Neill, Judge. Affirmed.
    Russell S. Babcock, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and
    Appellant.
    No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.
    In June 2013, Stephen Charles Sanders entered a negotiated guilty plea to two
    counts of kidnapping (Pen. Code, § 207, subd. (a); counts 4 and 8); all further statutory
    references are to the Penal Code), each with a gang enhancement (§ 186.22, subd. (b)(1)).
    At the time of the plea bargain, Sanders had four other pending trial court cases: case
    No. SCD204952 (Court of Appeal No. D064744), case No. SCD216604 (Court of Appeal
    No. D064775), case No. SCD222861 (Court of Appeal No. D064749) and case No.
    SCD239270 (Court of Appeal No. D064746). The plea bargain provided, as to all five
    cases, for a stipulated 25-year sentence and waiver of the right to appeal. In September,
    the court denied Sanders's motion to withdraw his plea. The court sentenced Sanders to
    25 years in prison including, in the instant case, the five-year middle term on count 4, a
    10-year term for the gang enhancement and concurrent terms on count 8 and its
    enhancement. Sanders appeals. We affirm.
    BACKGROUND
    In April 2007, Sanders was president of the San Diego chapter of the Hells
    Angels, deemed by law enforcement to be an outlaw motorcycle gang. At a Hells Angels
    meeting in their clubhouse, Sanders called for a vote, and Nick Neff was voted out of the
    Hells Angels in bad standing. Neff was attacked and, at Sanders's direction, taken
    outside and restrained. Neff was brought back into the clubhouse and Sanders restrained
    him while, at Sanders's direction, Hells Angels vice president David Dabbs used a tattoo
    gun to obliterate all of Neff's tattoos. Sanders warned Neff that if he spoke to the police,
    the Hells Angels would cut off his head. Sanders and two other Hells Angels' members
    took Neff, in Sanders's truck, to retrieve the title to Neff's motorcycle. Neff signed over
    the title under duress. Sanders and the two other Hells Angels' members then took Neff
    to Neff's home, where the two other members escorted Neff inside. There, the two
    members took a television, a Hells Angels calendar and photographs of Hells Angels'
    2
    members. In June 2011, Neff's motorcycle was recovered outside the clubhouse in the
    possession of a Hells Angels' member.
    In May 2010, Preston James worked at a motorcycle shop owned by Sanders's
    wife. Sanders arrived at the shop with two other Hells Angels' members, Kirtith Nielsen
    and Mike Ottinger, and Shane Sanders (Shane), Sanders's son and later president of the
    Wrecking Machine, a motorcycle group run by Sanders. Sanders asked James to help
    load tables and chairs into a truck. As James lifted a stack of chairs, Nielsen hit him in
    the back of the head with a baseball bat. The blow caused James to stumble and defecate.
    As Ottinger acted as a look out, Nielsen hit James several more times with the bat.
    Nielsen, Shane and Sanders punched James. James was knocked to the ground.
    Stephens took James's cell phone and knife and told him they were going to take his
    motorcycle. At Sanders's direction, Shane and Nielsen put James in Shane's truck and
    drove him to James's home to get James's guns. Sanders and Ottinger also went to
    James's home, in Sanders's truck. Sanders and Ottinger went into the home, then came
    out with James's gun, a gun belonging to James's roommate and items bearing Hells
    Angels' insignias. James was allowed to get out of Shane's truck, and Sanders and his
    three companions left. James went inside and discovered the pink slips for his two
    motorcycles and his car were missing.
    James suffered multiple facial fractures and broken ribs. He was hospitalized and
    underwent surgery. Without James's knowledge, title to one of his motorcycles was
    transferred to Aden Stay, former president of the Wrecking Machine and a friend of
    Sanders. Sanders had the motorcycle shipped to Stay in Hawaii. In March 2011, the
    3
    motorcycle was shipped back to Sanders in San Diego. Without James's knowledge, the
    motorcycle was reregistered in his name. Sanders called James and said, "Nobody needs
    to go into handcuffs over this." The motorcycle was subsequently recovered in San
    Diego by James. While in custody, Sanders attempted to enlist others to kill witnesses,
    victims, a law enforcement agent and deputy district attorneys associated with the
    prosecution of this case.
    DISCUSSION
    Appointed appellate counsel has filed a brief summarizing the facts and
    proceedings below. Counsel presents no argument for reversal, but asks this court to
    review the record for error as mandated by People v. Wende (1979) 
    25 Cal. 3d 436
    (Wende). Pursuant to Anders v. California (1967) 
    386 U.S. 738
    (Anders), counsel lists,
    as a possible, but not arguable, issue, whether the waiver of appellate rights was knowing,
    intelligent and voluntary.
    We granted Sanders permission to file a brief on his own behalf. He has done so
    and raises contentions concerning the validity of his plea, the denial of his plea
    withdrawal motion, prosecutorial misconduct and ineffective assistance of counsel.
    "A guilty plea admits every element of the offense charged and is a conclusive
    admission of guilt." (People v. Maultsby (2012) 
    53 Cal. 4th 296
    , 302.) The absence of a
    certificate of probable cause prevents Sanders from challenging the validity of his guilty
    plea. (§ 1237.5; People v. Mendez (1999) 
    19 Cal. 4th 1084
    , 1095.) Furthermore, as part
    of his plea, Sanders waived the right to appeal. The record shows Sanders's waiver of
    appellate rights was knowing, intelligent and voluntary.
    4
    A review of the record pursuant to Wende and Anders, including the possible issue
    listed pursuant to Anders, has disclosed no reasonably arguable appellate issue. Sanders
    has been competently represented by counsel on this appeal.
    DISPOSITION
    The judgment is affirmed.
    MCINTYRE, J.
    WE CONCUR:
    NARES, Acting P. J.
    AARON, J.
    5
    

Document Info

Docket Number: D064743

Filed Date: 3/24/2015

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 3/24/2015