P. v. Scroogins CA4/1 ( 2013 )


Menu:
  • Filed 3/19/13P. v. Scroogins CA4/1
    NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
    California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for
    publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication
    or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
    COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
    DIVISION ONE
    STATE OF CALIFORNIA
    THE PEOPLE,                                                         D062457
    Plaintiff and Respondent,
    v.                                                         (Super. Ct. No. SCD240860)
    DAVID SCROGGINS,
    Defendant and Appellant.
    APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Frederic L.
    Link, Judge. Affirmed.
    David Scroggins entered a negotiated guilty plea to one count of residential
    burglary (Pen. Code, § 459/460) and admitted having one prior serious/violent felony or
    strike conviction (Pen. Code, § 667, subds. (b)-(i)). In exchange for the plea, the
    prosecution agreed to dismiss two other strike allegations. The parties stipulated to an
    eight-year prison term and victim restitution in the amount of $23,600. The trial court
    sentenced Scroggins in accordance with the terms of the plea bargain.
    FACTS
    On February 1, 2012, Scroggins entered a family residence with the intent to steal.
    DISCUSSION
    Appointed appellate counsel has filed a brief setting forth evidence in the superior
    court. Counsel presents no argument for reversal, but asks that this court review the
    record for error as mandated by People v. Wende (1979) 
    25 Cal.3d 436
    . Counsel has not
    referred us to any possible but not arguable issues. (See Anders v. California (1967) 
    386 U.S. 738
    . We granted Scroggins permission to file a brief on his own behalf. He has not
    responded.
    A review of the record pursuant to People v. Wende, supra, 
    25 Cal.3d 436
     and
    Anders v. California, 
    supra,
     
    386 U.S. 738
     has disclosed no reasonably arguable appellate
    issue. Competent counsel has represented Scroggins on this appeal.
    DISPOSITION
    The judgment is affirmed.
    HUFFMAN, Acting P. J.
    WE CONCUR:
    O'ROURKE, J.
    AARON, J.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: D062457

Filed Date: 3/19/2013

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/18/2021