People v. Tavanlar CA2/6 ( 2015 )


Menu:
  • Filed 9/21/15 P. v. Tavanlar CA2/6
    NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
    California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for
    publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication
    or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
    IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
    SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
    DIVISION SIX
    THE PEOPLE,                                                                  2d Crim. No. B257130
    (Super. Ct. No. 2013001034)
    Plaintiff and Respondent,                                                 (Ventura County)
    v.
    ELIGIO BATTAD TAVANLAR,
    Defendant and Appellant.
    Eligio Battad Tavanlar appeals from a judgment entered after he pled
    guilty to one count of conspiracy (Pen. Code, § 182, subd. (a)(1); three burglaries (id.
    §§ 459/460), eight identity thefts (id. § 530.5, subd. (a)); two driver's license forgeries
    (id. § 470a); and three other forgeries (id. § 470, subd. (d)). The trial court denied his
    motion to withdraw his guilty plea and sentenced him to a stipulated term of nine years.
    In 2012, appellant and his sister and codefendant Melendre Tavanlar
    acquired identification documents from multiple victims, manufactured false
    identification documents and checks, and cashed or attempted to cash the false checks.
    We appointed counsel to represent appellant in this appeal. After reviewing
    the record, counsel filed an opening brief raising no issues and requesting this court to
    independently examine the record pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 
    25 Cal.3d 436
    .
    We advised appellant that he had 30 days in which to submit a written brief or letter
    stating any contentions or arguments he wished us to consider, but have received no
    reply.
    We have examined the entire record. We are satisfied that appellant's
    appellate counsel has fully complied with his responsibilities and that no arguable issues
    exist. (People v. Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d at p. 441; People v. Kelly (2006) 
    40 Cal.4th 106
    , 126.)
    The judgment is affirmed.
    NOT TO BE PUBLISHED.
    PERREN, J.
    We concur:
    GILBERT, P. J.
    YEGAN, J.
    2
    Mark S. Borrell, Judge
    Superior Court County of Ventura
    ______________________________
    California Appellate Project, Jonathan B. Steiner, and Richard B. Lennon,
    under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
    No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: B257130

Filed Date: 9/21/2015

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/18/2021