People v. Ynclan CA3 ( 2013 )


Menu:
  • Filed 12/23/13 P. v. Ynclan CA3
    NOT TO BE PUBLISHED
    California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for
    publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication
    or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
    IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
    THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT
    (Sutter)
    ----
    THE PEOPLE,                                                                                   C074203
    Plaintiff and Respondent,                                    (Super. Ct. No. CRF130053)
    v.
    GINO ROBERT YNCLAN,
    Defendant and Appellant.
    On January 5, 2013, defendant Gino Robert Ynclan knowingly possessed
    methamphetamine in Sutter County jail.
    Defendant pleaded no contest to possession of a controlled substance in county jail
    (Pen. Code, § 4573.6; undesignated statutory references are to the Penal Code) and
    admitted he was disqualified from sentencing pursuant to section 1170, subdivision (h)
    due to a prior serious or violent felony conviction. The trial court sentenced him to a
    stipulated term of three years in state prison, imposed various fines and fees, and awarded
    189 days’ presentence credit (95 actual and 94 conduct).
    Defendant appeals. He did not obtain a certificate of probable cause.
    1
    We appointed counsel to represent defendant on appeal. Counsel filed an opening
    brief that sets forth the facts of the case and requests this court to review the record and
    determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende (1979)
    
    25 Cal. 3d 436
    .) Defendant was advised by counsel of the right to file a supplemental
    brief within 30 days of the date of filing of the opening brief. More than 30 days elapsed,
    and we received no communication from defendant. Having undertaken an examination
    of the entire record, we find no arguable error that would result in a disposition more
    favorable to defendant.
    DISPOSITION
    The judgment is affirmed.
    HULL                   , J.
    We concur:
    NICHOLSON              , Acting P. J.
    HOCH                   , J.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: C074203

Filed Date: 12/23/2013

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/18/2021