People v. Thornton CA4/1 ( 2016 )


Menu:
  • Filed 2/29/16 P. v. Thornton CA4/1
    NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
    California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for
    publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication
    or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
    COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
    DIVISION ONE
    STATE OF CALIFORNIA
    THE PEOPLE,                                                         D068880
    Plaintiff and Respondent,
    v.                                                         (Super. Ct. No. SCN130098)
    KEITH THORNTON,
    Defendant and Appellant.
    APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of San Diego County, David J.
    Danielsen, Judge. Affirmed.
    Richard L. Fitzer for Defendant and Appellant.
    No appearance for Respondent.
    In 2002, a jury convicted Keith Richard Thornton of first degree burglary (Pen.
    Code,1 §§ 459, 460); second degree commercial burglary (§ 459) and receiving a stolen
    vehicle (§ 496d). Multiple strike allegations were also found true. Thornton was
    sentenced in this case and one other to an aggregate term of 102 years to life in prison.
    1        All further statutory references are to the Penal Code unless otherwise specified.
    In March 2014, Thornton filed a petition under Proposition 36 (§ 1170.126) to
    recall his sentence. In August 2015, Thornton filed a petition under Proposition 47
    (§ 1170.18) to redesignate certain felony convictions as misdemeanors.
    Ultimately the trial court granted Proposition 36 relief and resentenced Thornton
    to an aggregate term of 35 years, 8 months to life. The court denied Proposition 47 relief,
    finding the burglary was of a private garage, and Thornton could not show the value of
    the stolen vehicle was less than $950.
    Thornton filed a timely notice of appeal.
    Appellate counsel has filed a brief pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 
    25 Cal. 3d 436
    (Wende), indicating he has not been able to identify any reasonably arguable
    issues for reversal on appeal. Counsel asks this court to review the record for error as
    mandated by Wende. We offered Thornton the opportunity to file his own brief on appeal
    but he has not responded.
    STATEMENT OF FACTS
    The probation report shows that Thornton stole a motorcycle out of an open,
    attached garage on April 2, 2001. On April 13, 2001, a victim reported an all terrain
    vehicle (ATV) was stolen from a garage in Imperial County. On April 15, 2001,
    Thornton was observed loading an ATV into his truck. He was arrested. It was
    determined that the original ATV had been taken apart and reassembled with parts from
    other ATV's.
    2
    DISCUSSION
    As we have noted, appellate counsel has filed a brief pursuant to 
    Wende, supra
    , 
    25 Cal. 3d 436
    , requesting this court to review the record for error. In compliance with
    Anders v. California (1967) 
    386 U.S. 738
    (Anders), counsel has identified the following
    possible, but not reasonably arguable issue to assist us in our review of the record:
    Whether the trial court erred by denying Thornton's motion to reduce the three
    counts in case SCN130098 to misdemeanors.
    We have reviewed the entire record in compliance with 
    Wende, supra
    , 
    25 Cal. 3d 436
    and 
    Anders, supra
    , 
    386 U.S. 738
    and have not been able to identify any reasonably
    arguable issues for reversal on appeal. Competent counsel has represented Thornton on
    this appeal.
    DISPOSITION
    The order denying Thornton's petition for relief under section 1170.18 is affirmed.
    HUFFMAN, Acting P. J.
    WE CONCUR:
    McINTYRE, J.
    O'ROURKE, J.
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: D068880

Filed Date: 2/29/2016

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/18/2021