People v. Garcia CA5 ( 2022 )


Menu:
  • Filed 10/24/22 P. v. Garcia CA5
    NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
    California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for
    publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication
    or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
    IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
    FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
    THE PEOPLE,
    F084441
    Plaintiff and Respondent,
    (Super. Ct. No. F19902080)
    v.
    RICHARD GARCIA, JR.,                                                                     OPINION
    Defendant and Appellant.
    THE COURT *
    APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County. Michael G.
    Idiart, Judge.
    Martin Baker, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and
    Appellant.
    Office of the State Attorney General, Sacramento, California, for Plaintiff and
    Respondent.
    -ooOoo-
    * Before     Hill, P. J., Levy, J. and Snauffer, J.
    STATEMENT OF APPEALABILITY
    This is an appeal from a final judgment following a no contest plea and is based on
    the sentence imposed. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.304(b)(2)(B).) It is authorized by
    Penal Code section 1237.1
    STATEMENT OF THE CASE
    Appellant Richard Garcia, Jr. was charged by an information with the following
    six felony counts: attempted murder of John Doe (§§ 664/187, subd. (a); count 1);
    assault with a firearm upon Ana M. (§ 245, subd. (a)(2); count 2); assault with a
    semiautomatic firearm upon Ana M. (§ 245, subd. (b); count 3); assault with a firearm
    upon Anthony S. (§ 245, subd. (a)(2); count 4); assault with a semiautomatic firearm
    upon Anthony S. (§ 245, subd. (b); count 5); and possession of a firearm by a prohibited
    person (§ 29800, subd. (a)(1); count 6). As to count 1, it was alleged that Garcia
    personally discharged a firearm causing great bodily injury or death. (§ 12022.53, subd.
    (d).) As to counts 2, 3, 4, and 5, it was alleged that Garcia personally used a firearm.
    (§ 12022.5, subd. (a).) And as to counts 2 and 3, it was alleged that Garcia personally
    inflicted great bodily injury. (§ 12022.7, subd. (a).) Each count was alleged to have been
    committed on or about February 10, 2019. A prior serious felony (or “strike”) conviction
    was also alleged. (§§ 667, subds. (b)-(i), 1170.12, subds. (a)-(d).)
    On October 27, 2021, Garcia entered into a plea agreement whereby he pled no
    contest to assault with a firearm (§ 245, subd. (b); count 5), and admitted the
    enhancements for a prior “strike” conviction and firearm use, with the understanding that
    he would be sentenced to a maximum (or “lid”) of 15 years state prison and he would be
    free to argue at sentencing for a lesser sentence. Garcia stipulated that there was a factual
    basis for his plea.
    1   All statutory references are to the Penal Code unless otherwise stated.
    2.
    On March 30, 2022, Garcia’s counsel filed a Romero2 motion, requesting his prior
    “strike” be stricken.
    On May 26, 2022, at the sentencing hearing the trial court noted that the maximum
    possible prison term (but for the stipulated 15-year “lid”) was 28 years and, while
    acknowledging that “there was an element of imperfect self-defense here,” the court
    nonetheless found that it did not rise to a level that mitigated below 15 years. In addition,
    the trial court stated it did not believe that the Romero motion “should be granted because
    this is a crime of violence that was involving violent conduct.” Accordingly, the court
    imposed the middle term of 12 years (six years doubled due to the prior “strike”
    conviction), plus the low term of three years for the firearm use enhancement to be served
    consecutively, for a total aggregate term of 15 years state prison. Garcia was awarded
    1178 actual days credit and 176 days of conduct credit, for a total of 1354 days.
    (§ 2933.1.)
    On June 3, 2022, Garcia filed a timely notice of appeal.
    STATEMENT OF FACTS 3
    On February 10, 2019, Garcia was involved in an altercation in the parking lot of
    an apartment complex in Fresno, California. During that altercation, Garcia brandished a
    firearm at two men who were assaulting him, causing them to flee. As they fled, Garcia
    fired one round in their direction. Garcia then brandished his firearm at an intervening
    bystander before firing two more rounds toward the fleeing men. One of the rounds
    Garcia fired struck Ana M., causing her to suffer a collapsed lung.
    2   People v. Superior Court (Romero) (1996) 
    13 Cal.4th 497
    .
    3 The facts are drawn from the probation officer’s report, and the transcript of the
    preliminary hearing on August 4-5, 2021.
    3.
    APPELLATE COURT REVIEW
    Garcia’s appointed appellate counsel has filed an opening brief that summarizes
    the pertinent facts, raises no issues, and requests this court to review the record
    independently. (People v. Wende (1979) 
    25 Cal.3d 436
     (Wende).) The opening brief also
    includes the declaration of appellate counsel indicating Garcia was advised he could file
    his own brief with this court. By letter on September 6, 2022, we invited Garcia to
    submit additional briefing. To date, he has not done so.
    Having undertaken an examination of the entire record, we find no evidence of
    ineffective assistance of counsel or any other arguable error that would result in a
    disposition more favorable to Garcia.
    DISPOSITION
    The judgment is affirmed.
    4.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: F084441

Filed Date: 10/24/2022

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/24/2022