P. v. Walker CA4/2 ( 2013 )


Menu:
  • Filed 3/28/13 P. v. Walker CA4/2
    NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
    California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for
    publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication
    or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
    IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
    FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
    DIVISION TWO
    THE PEOPLE,
    Plaintiff and Respondent,                                       E056908
    v.                                                                       (Super.Ct.No. FSB905426)
    ALCIDE LEVONT LEWIS WALKER,                                              OPINION
    Defendant and Appellant.
    APPEAL from the Superior Court of San Bernardino County. Bryan Foster,
    Judge. Affirmed.
    Neil Auwarter, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and
    Appellant.
    No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.
    1
    INTRODUCTION
    On July 2, 2010, an information charged defendant and appellant Alcide Levont
    Lewis Walker with murder (Pen. Code, § 187, subd. (a)),1 and included a special
    allegation that he personally discharged a firearm causing death (§ 12022.53, subd. (d))
    (count 1); second degree robbery (§ 211), including a special allegation that he personally
    discharged a firearm causing death (§ 12022.53, subd. (d)) (count 2); possession of a
    firearm by a felon (§ 12021, subd. (a)(1)) (count 3); and attempted murder (§ 664, 187,
    subd. (a)), including a special allegation that he personally discharged a firearm causing
    great bodily injury (§ 12022.53, subd. (d)) (count 4). The information further alleged one
    prior prison term. (§ 667.5, subd. (b).)
    On November 5, 2010, defendant made a Marsden2 motion requesting new
    appointed counsel. After a hearing, the trial court denied the motion.
    On January 19, 2011, jury trial commenced. On that same date, on a motion by
    the prosecution and in the interest of justice, count 3 was dismissed (§ 12021,
    subd. (a)(1)), and the prior prison term allegation (§ 667.5, subd. (b)) was stricken.
    On January 24, 2011, pursuant to a written plea agreement, defendant pled guilty
    to first degree murder (§ 187, subd. (a)) under count 1 and admitted the personal firearm
    discharge allegation (§ 12022.53, subd. (d)), in exchange for a stipulated sentence of 50
    years to life in state prison, the dismissal of the remaining allegations, and the
    1   All further statutory references are to the Penal Code unless otherwise indicated.
    2   People v. Marsden (1970) 
    2 Cal.3d 118
    .
    2
    prosecution’s agreement to uphold all prior agreements with codefendants. The
    agreement further purported to waive defendant’s right to appeal the judgment.
    On June 5, 2012, Appellate Defenders, Inc., filed a petition for writ of habeas
    corpus on behalf of defendant to establish the constructive timely filing of a notice of
    appeal. On July 27, 2012, we granted the petition. On August 3, 2012, defendant filed
    his notice of appeal challenging the sentence or other matters not affecting the validity of
    the plea and challenging the validity of the plea or admission. The notice of appeal
    included a request for a certificate of probable cause, which the trial court denied.
    STATEMENT OF FACTS
    According to the probation report, on December 10, 2009, defendant fatally shot a
    man who had cheated defendant in a methamphetamine transaction.
    ANALYSIS
    After defendant appealed, and upon his request, this court appointed counsel to
    represent him. Counsel has filed a brief under the authority of People v. Wende (1979)
    
    25 Cal.3d 436
     and Anders v. California (1967) 
    386 U.S. 738
    , setting forth a statement of
    the case, a summary of the facts and potential arguable issues, and requesting this court to
    undertake a review of the entire record.
    We offered defendant an opportunity to file a personal supplemental brief, but he
    has not done so. Pursuant to the mandate of People v. Kelly (2006) 
    40 Cal.4th 106
    , we
    have conducted an independent review of the record and find no arguable issues.
    3
    DISPOSITION
    The judgment is affirmed.
    NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
    McKINSTER
    J.
    We concur:
    HOLLENHORST
    Acting P. J.
    CODRINGTON
    J.
    4
    

Document Info

Docket Number: E056908

Filed Date: 3/28/2013

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/17/2021