People v. Thompson CA2/2 ( 2014 )


Menu:
  • Filed 9/16/14 P. v. Thompson CA2/2
    NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
    California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for
    publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication
    or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
    IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
    SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
    DIVISION TWO
    THE PEOPLE,                                                          B249433
    Plaintiff and Respondent,                                   (Los Angeles County
    Super. Ct. No. NA091280)
    v.
    BRADEN WILLIAM THOMPSON,
    Defendant and Appellant.
    APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County.
    Tomson T. Ong, Judge. Affirmed as modified.
    Leslie Conrad, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and
    Appellant.
    Kamala D. Harris, Attorney General, Lance E. Winters, Assistant Attorney
    General, Paul M. Roadarmel, Jr., and Connie H. Kan, Deputy Attorneys General, for
    Plaintiff and Respondent.
    _________________________
    The sole issue on appeal is whether the trial court erred in imposing a $1,000
    assessment and surcharge on appellant Braden William Thompson under Penal Code
    section 14641 and Government Code section 76000. Both appellant and the People agree
    that the assessment must be stricken. We strike the $1,000 assessment and otherwise
    affirm the judgment.
    Conviction and Sentencing2
    A jury found appellant guilty of second degree murder, shooting at an inhabited
    dwelling, possession of a handgun by a felon, and two counts of attempted murder. The
    jury also made true findings that appellant personally used and discharged a firearm.
    (§ 12022.53, subds. (b), (c).) The trial court found that appellant had served two prior
    prison terms (§ 667.5, subd. (b)).
    The trial court sentenced appellant to 97 years eight months to life in prison.
    Appellant was ordered to pay a $40 court operations assessment (§ 1465.8, subd. (a)(1))
    and a $30 criminal conviction assessment (Gov. Code, § 70373) for each count. The trial
    court also imposed a $5,000 restitution fine payable to the California Victim
    Compensation and Government Claims Board (§ 1202.4, subs. (f)), a $1,784.12
    restitution fine payable to the victim, a $10,000 restitution fine (§ 1202.4, subd. (b)), a
    $10,000 parole restitution fine (§ 1202.45) to be stayed upon completion of parole, and a
    $1,000 assessment and surcharge payable to the probation officer (§ 1464, Gov. Code,
    § 76000).
    1
    All further statutory references are to the Penal Code unless otherwise indicated.
    2
    Because the facts of appellant’s case are not at issue on appeal, we omit them.
    2
    DISCUSSION
    Section 1464 and Government Code section 76000 levy additional penalties upon
    every fine, penalty or forfeiture imposed and collected by the courts for all criminal
    cases.3 But these statutes expressly state that the penalties they impose do not apply to
    any restitution fines. (§ 1464, subd. (a)(3)(A); Gov. Code, § 76000, subd. (a)(3)(A).)
    The penalties imposed by section 1464 and Government Code section 76000 also do not
    apply to the $40 court operations assessments imposed under section 1465.8, subdivision
    (a)(1) or to the $30 criminal conviction assessments imposed under Government Code
    section 70373, subdivision (a)(1). (See § 1465.8, subdivision (b); Gov. Code, § 70373,
    subd. (b).)
    Because section 1464 or Government Code section 76000 are not applicable to
    any of the fines imposed upon appellant, the $1,000 penalty assessment must be stricken
    from the judgment.4
    3
    Section 1464, subdivision (a)(1) states in part: “Subject to Chapter 12
    (commencing with Section 76000) of Title 8 of the Government Code, and except as
    otherwise provided in this section, there shall be levied a state penalty in the amount of
    ten dollars ($10) for every ten dollars ($10), or part of ten dollars ($10), upon every fine,
    penalty, or forfeiture imposed and collected by the courts for all criminal offenses, . . .”
    Government Code section 76000, subdivision (a)(1) states in part: “Except as
    otherwise provided elsewhere in this section, in each county there shall be levied an
    additional penalty in the amount of seven dollars ($7) for every ten dollars ($10), or part
    of ten dollars ($10), upon every fine, penalty, or forfeiture imposed and collected by the
    courts for all criminal offenses, . . .”
    4
    We note that the $1,000 penalty assessment is not included in the abstract of
    judgment. It is, however, part of the trial court’s oral pronouncement at sentencing and is
    included in the minute order.
    3
    DISPOSITION
    The $1,000 assessment and surcharge is stricken from the judgment. In all other
    respects, the judgment is affirmed.
    NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS.
    __________________________, J.
    ASHMANN-GERST
    We concur:
    _____________________________, P. J.
    BOREN
    ______________________________, J.*
    FERNS
    *
    Judge of the Los Angeles Superior Court, assigned by the Chief Justice pursuant to
    article VI, section 6 of the California Constitution.
    4
    

Document Info

Docket Number: B249433

Filed Date: 9/16/2014

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/18/2021