People v. Wilson CA4/1 ( 2014 )

Filed 9/26/14 P. v. Wilson CA4/1
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for
publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication
or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION ONE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
THE PEOPLE, D065831
Plaintiff and Respondent,
v. (Super. Ct. No. SCD252160)
TONY WILSON,
Defendant and Appellant.
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Timothy
R. Walsh, Judge. Affirmed.
Leslie A. Rose, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and
Appellant.
No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.
Tony Wilson entered a negotiated guilty plea to felony vandalism (Pen. Code,
§ 594, subds. (a), (b)(1)) and misdemeanor resisting an officer (Pen. Code, § 148, subd.
(a)(1)). The court sentenced him to a stipulated 16-month lower term in jail on the
vandalism offense, with credit for time served for resisting an officer. Wilson appeals.
We affirm.
BACKGROUND
On November 8, 2013, Wilson entered a restaurant where he threw chairs and
tables and knocked over a bin, causing approximately $1,000 in damage. Wilson then
went outside and fought with officers employed in the security wing of the San Diego
Metropolitan Transit System.
DISCUSSION
Appointed appellate counsel has filed a brief summarizing the proceedings below.
Counsel presents no argument for reversal, but asks this court to review the record for
error as mandated by People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal. 3d 436 (Wende). Pursuant to
Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738 (Anders) counsel mentions as possible, but not
arguable, issues (1) whether Wilson's waiver of his right to appeal was valid; (2) whether
his plea was constitutionally valid; and (3) whether his trial counsel provided ineffective
assistance.
We granted Wilson permission to file a brief on his own behalf. He has not
responded. A review of the record pursuant to Wende and Anders, including the possible
issues listed pursuant to Anders, has disclosed no reasonably arguable appellate issues.
Wilson has been competently represented by counsel on this appeal.
2
DISPOSITION
The judgment is affirmed.
AARON, J.
WE CONCUR:
BENKE, Acting P. J.
O'ROURKE, J.
3