People v. Tutor CA4/1 ( 2016 )


Menu:
  • Filed 8/23/16 P. v. Tutor CA4/1
    NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
    California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for
    publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication
    or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
    COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
    DIVISION ONE
    STATE OF CALIFORNIA
    THE PEOPLE,                                                         D070029
    Plaintiff and Respondent,
    v.                                                         (Super. Ct. No. SCD232510)
    CHRISTOPHER C. TUTOR,
    Defendant and Appellant.
    APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Jay M.
    Bloom, Judge. Affirmed.
    Cynthia M. Jones, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and
    Appellant.
    No appearance by Plaintiff and Respondent.
    In 2011, Christopher C. Tutor was charged with rape of an unconscious person
    (Pen. Code,1 § 261, subd. (a)(4); count 1) and rape of an intoxicated person (§ 261,
    subd. (a)(3); count 2). As a result of plea negotiations, an amended complaint was filed
    1        All further statutory references are to the Penal Code unless otherwise specified.
    and Tutor was allowed to plead to one count of aggravated assault (§ 245, subd. (a)(1))
    and one count of misdemeanor lewd conduct (§ 647, subd. (a)).
    In 2012, Tutor was granted probation subject to certain conditions. Tutor
    successfully completed probation.
    In 2016, Tutor brought a motion to reduce his conviction to a misdemeanor
    pursuant to section 17, subdivision (b). The motion was denied.
    Tutor filed a timely notice of appeal.
    Appellate counsel has filed a brief pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 
    25 Cal. 3d 436
    (Wende), indicating she has been unable to identify any reasonably arguable
    issue for reversal on appeal. Counsel asks this court to review the record for error as
    mandated by Wende. We offered Tutor the opportunity to file his own brief on appeal,
    but he has not responded.
    STATEMENT OF FACTS
    As this case arises from a postplea motion to reduce the sentence, we only have
    the facts of the guilty plea itself as background for this appeal. In his guilty plea form
    Tutor said he "committed an assault upon the person of another by means likely to
    produce great bodily injury & engaged in lewd conduct in a public place."
    DISCUSSION
    Appellate counsel has filed a brief pursuant to 
    Wende, supra
    , 
    25 Cal. 3d 436
    . In
    that brief, counsel has identified several possible issues pursuant to Anders v. California
    (1967) 
    386 U.S. 738
    (Anders):
    2
    1. Whether the trial court erred in declining to reduce Tutor's section 245,
    subdivision (a)(1) conviction to a misdemeanor pursuant to section 17, subdivision (b)(3);
    and
    2. Whether the plea to section 245, subdivision (a)(1) was authorized since the
    statute was amended effective January 2012, to move this particular offense to
    subdivision (b)(4). (The offense in this case was committed in 2011.)
    We have reviewed the entire record in accordance with 
    Wende, supra
    , 
    25 Cal. 3d 436
    and 
    Anders, supra
    , 
    386 U.S. 738
    and have not identified any reasonably arguable
    issue for reversal on appeal. Competent counsel has represented Tutor on this appeal.
    DISPOSITION
    The order denying the motion to reduce the section 245, subdivision (a)(1) offense
    to a misdemeanor is affirmed.
    HUFFMAN, Acting P. J.
    WE CONCUR:
    NARES, J.
    PRAGER, J.*
    *       Judge of the San Diego Superior Court, assigned by the Chief Justice pursuant to
    article VI, section 6 of the California Constitution.
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: D070029

Filed Date: 8/23/2016

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/18/2021