In re D.J. CA2/5 ( 2013 )


Menu:
  • Filed 6/13/13 In re D.J. CA2/5
    NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
    California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for
    publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication
    or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
    IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
    SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
    DIVISION FIVE
    In re D.J., a Person Coming Under the                                B242917
    Juvenile Court Law.
    (Los Angeles County
    Super. Ct. No. CK92457)
    LOS ANGELES COUNTY
    DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND
    FAMILY SERVICES,
    Plaintiff and Respondent,
    v.
    MICHELE B.,
    Defendant and Appellant.
    APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Rudolph A.
    Diaz, Judge. Affirmed with directions.
    Karen B. Stalter, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and
    Appellant.
    John F. Krattli, County Counsel, James M. Owens, Assistant County Counsel and
    Tracey Dodds, Deputy County Counsel for Plaintiff and Respondent.
    M.B., the mother of D.J., appeals from a Welfare and Institutions Code sections
    300 and 361 dependency orders. The mother contends there was noncompliance with the
    Indian Child Welfare Act and related California provisions. The Department of Children
    and Family Services agrees. We agree likewise. (In re Marinna J. (2001) 
    90 Cal.App.4th 731
    , 736-740; In re Desiree F. (2000) 
    83 Cal.App.4th 460
    , 471-472.) Upon
    remittitur issuance, the juvenile court is to comply with the with the federal Indian Child
    Welfare Act requirements and related state provisions. We need not reverse the
    dispositional order. (In re Veronica G. (2007) 
    157 Cal.App.4th 179
    , 187; In re Brooke C.
    (2005) 
    127 Cal.App.4th 377
    , 385.). We leave the issue of what to do if a tribe asserts
    jurisdiction over the child in the good hands of the juvenile court.
    The orders under review are affirmed and the cause is remanded for compliance
    with the federal Indian Child Welfare Act requirements
    NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
    TURNER, P. J.
    We concur:
    KRIEGLER, J.
    O’NEILL, J.*
    *
    Judge of the Ventura County Superior Court, assigned by the Chief Justice
    pursuant to article VI, section 6 of the California Constitution.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: B242917

Filed Date: 6/13/2013

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/18/2021