People v. Robinson CA3 ( 2023 )


Menu:
  • Filed 6/21/23 P. v. Robinson CA3
    NOT TO BE PUBLISHED
    California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for
    publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication
    or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
    IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
    THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT
    (Sacramento)
    ----
    THE PEOPLE,                                                                                C096754
    Plaintiff and Respondent,                                      (Super. Ct. No. 05F03986)
    v.
    JULIUS MONTEREY ROBINSON,
    Defendant and Appellant.
    Defendant Julius Monterrey Robinson appeals the trial court’s denial of his
    petition for resentencing under Penal Code section 1172.6.1 Counsel filed a brief raising
    no arguable issues under People v. Delgadillo (2022) 
    14 Cal.5th 216
     (Delgadillo).
    1 Undesignated statutory references are to the Penal Code. Effective June 30, 2022, the
    Legislature renumbered former section 1170.95 to section 1172.6. (Stats. 2022, ch. 58,
    § 10.) There were no substantive changes to the statute. Defendant filed his petition
    under former section 1170.95, but we will cite to the current section 1172.6 throughout
    this opinion.
    1
    On April 6, 2023, we notified defendant: (1) counsel had filed a brief indicating
    no arguable issues had been identified by counsel; (2) as a case arising from an order
    denying postconviction relief, defendant was not entitled to counsel or to an independent
    review of the record; and (3) in accordance with the procedures set forth in Delgadillo,
    defendant had 30 days in which to file a supplemental brief or letter raising any argument
    he wanted this court to consider. In addition, we notified defendant that if we did not
    receive a letter or brief within that 30-day period, the court may dismiss the appeal as
    abandoned. More than 30 days have elapsed and we have received no communication
    from defendant.
    We consider defendant’s appeal abandoned and order the appeal dismissed.
    (Delgadillo, supra, 14 Cal.5th at p. 232.)
    DISPOSITION
    The appeal is dismissed.
    /S/
    RENNER, J.
    We concur:
    /S/
    DUARTE, Acting P. J.
    /S/
    HORST, J.*
    * Judge of the Placer County Superior Court, assigned by the Chief Justice pursuant to
    article VI, section 6 of the California Constitution.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: C096754

Filed Date: 6/21/2023

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 6/21/2023