People v. Rodriguez CA2/8 ( 2023 )


Menu:
  • Filed 6/21/23 P. v. Rodriguez CA2/8
    NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
    California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions
    not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion
    has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
    IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
    SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
    DIVISION EIGHT
    THE PEOPLE,                                                   B325369
    Plaintiff and Respondent,                            Los Angeles County
    Super. Ct. No. PA057565-01
    v.
    JOSE LUIS RODRIGUEZ,
    Defendant and Appellant.
    APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los
    Angeles Count, Hayden Zacky, Judge. Affirmed.
    John F. Schuck, under appointment by the Court of Appeal,
    for Defendant and Appellant.
    No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.
    ——————————
    Pursuant to People v. Delgadillo (2022) 
    14 Cal.5th 216
    , we
    review this appeal from the denial of a petition for recall of
    sentence brought under Penal Code former section 1170.95.1 We
    affirm the trial court’s order.
    PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
    On April 27, 2009, a jury found appellant Jose Rodriguez
    guilty of willful, deliberate, premeditated attempted murder in
    violation of Penal Code sections 664 and 187, subdivision (a)
    2
    (counts 1 and 2) ; possession of a firearm by a felon in violation of
    section 12021, subdivision (a)(1) (count 3); and assault with a
    semi-automatic firearm in violation of section 254, subdivision (b)
    (counts 5 and 6). Appellant was convicted of shooting two men
    outside the apartment building where his mother lived.
    The jury also found true firearm use and discharge allegations,
    great bodily injury allegations, and gang enhancements. In
    addition to the jury verdicts, appellant pleaded guilty to resisting
    an executive officer in violation of section 69 (count 4).
    On July 23, 2009, appellant was sentenced to life in prison
    with the possibility of parole plus 50 years on the attempted
    murder charges with the firearm enhancements. He was
    sentenced to a consecutive three-year term on the resisting
    charge. The sentences on counts 3, 5, and 6 were stayed.
    Appellant was the sole defendant charged in the amended
    1     Effective June 30, 2022, former section 1170.95 was
    renumbered section 1172.6 with no change in text. (Stats. 2022,
    ch. 58, § 10.) In this opinion we use the new code section.
    2       Further undesignated statutory references are to the Penal
    Code.
    2
    information. This court affirmed the convictions on appeal.
    (People v. Rodriguez (Jan. 24, 2011, B218361) [nonpub. opn.].)
    On February 22, 2022, appellant filed a petition for
    resentencing under section 1172.6. The court appointed counsel
    on appellant’s behalf. The People filed a response.
    On October 5, 2022, the trial court did not issue an order to
    show cause. Instead, it found appellant ineligible for relief
    because 1) appellant was prosecuted as the sole actual
    perpetrator who acted with malice and with the intent to kill
    during the commission of the crimes; and 2) the jury was not
    instructed on the natural and probable consequences doctrine or
    aiding and abetting.
    Appellant filed a timely notice of appeal.
    We appointed counsel to represent appellant on appeal. On
    April 20, 2023, counsel filed a brief pursuant to People v.
    Delgadillo. The brief raises no issues. Counsel advises that
    appellant was sent the record on appeal as well as a copy of the
    brief. Counsel told appellant he may file a supplemental brief
    within 30 days raising any issue he wishes us to consider.
    On April 20, 2023, this court sent appellant a notice that a
    brief raising no issues had been filed on his behalf. We advised
    appellant he had 30 days within which to submit a supplemental
    brief or letter stating any ground for an appeal he wishes this
    court to consider. Appellant was advised that if he did not file a
    supplemental brief, his appeal may be dismissed as abandoned.
    3
    On May 5, 2023, appellant filed a supplemental brief
    raising several issues: the prosecutor and his defense lawyer
    “railroaded” him; he acted in self-defense when he was confronted
    by two gang members; he had no intent to kill and did not plan
    the shooting “like they claimed I did”; and he did not act for the
    benefit of a gang.
    DISCUSSION
    First, counsel has asked us to conduct an independent
    review of the record. We are not required to do so in the context
    of an appeal from an order denying a petition for resentencing
    and we decline to do so. (People v. Delgadillo, supra, 14 Cal.5th
    at p. 226.)
    Next, appellant’s issues are not properly before our court.
    Petitions for resentencing under section 1172.6 carry out the
    intent of Senate Bill No. 1437 (2017–2018 Reg. Sess.) which was
    “to ensure that murder liability is not imposed on a person who is
    not the actual killer, did not act with the intent to kill, or was not
    a major participant in the underlying felony who acted with
    reckless indifference to human life.” (Stats. 2018, ch. 1015, § 1,
    subd. (f); People v. Lewis (2021) 
    11 Cal.5th 952
    , 967.) Petitions
    under section 1172.6, then, address convictions where a
    defendant was not the killer, but was held vicariously liable on
    one of several theories of liability identified in the statute. The
    petition to recall sentence under section 1172.6 is not another
    opportunity to challenge the original judgment on other grounds.
    4
    DISPOSITION
    The order denying the petition for recall of sentence is
    affirmed.
    NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
    STRATTON, P. J.
    We concur:
    GRIMES, J.
    VIRAMONTES, J.
    5
    

Document Info

Docket Number: B325369

Filed Date: 6/21/2023

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 6/21/2023