People v. Hamilton CA1/3 ( 2024 )


Menu:
  • Filed 2/20/24 P. v. Hamilton CA1/3
    NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
    California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for
    publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or
    ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
    IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
    FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT
    DIVISION THREE
    THE PEOPLE,
    Plaintiff and Respondent,                                     A169266
    v.
    ARMOND HAMILTON,                                                       (Alameda County Super. Ct.
    No. 16-CR-013773B)
    Defendant and Appellant.
    MEMORANDUM OPINION1
    In October 2022, as a result of a plea bargain, Armond Hamilton pled
    no contest to a charge of voluntary manslaughter with a firearm use
    enhancement. (Pen. Code, §§ 192, subd. (a), 12022.5, subd. (a).) The trial
    court sentenced him to 15 years in prison, and it reserved as to restitution.
    In October 2023 — pursuant to the parties’ stipulation — the court ordered
    Hamilton to pay $7,500 in restitution to the California Victim Compensation
    Board to reimburse it for payments made from the Restitution Fund.
    Hamilton appeals the restitution order. (We exercise our discretion to
    construe his appeal as having been filed after entry of the order for victim
    restitution on November 28, 2023. (See Cal. Rules of Court, rule
    1 We resolve this case by memorandum opinion.                                     (Cal. Stds. Jud.
    Admin., § 8.1.)
    1
    8.104(d)(2).)) His appointed counsel filed a brief raising no issues and asking
    this court to conduct an independent review of the record. (People v. Wende
    (1979) 
    25 Cal.3d 436
    .) Hamilton was apprised of his right to file a
    supplemental brief; he has not filed anything. We have independently
    reviewed the record for arguable issues. Having found none, we affirm.
    (Wende, at p. 441.)
    DISPOSITION
    The trial court’s order for victim restitution is affirmed.
    2
    _________________________
    RODRÍGUEZ, J.
    WE CONCUR:
    _________________________
    TUCHER, P. J.
    _________________________
    PETROU, J.
    A169266
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: A169266

Filed Date: 2/20/2024

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 2/20/2024