People v. Mustin CA2/6 ( 2024 )


Menu:
  • Filed 5/30/24 P. v. Mustin CA2/6
    NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
    California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions
    not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion
    has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
    IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
    SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
    DIVISION SIX
    THE PEOPLE,                                                2d Crim. No. B332404
    (Super. Ct. No. 2021025620)
    Plaintiff and Respondent,                               (Ventura County)
    v.
    JOSEPH SAMUEL MUSTIN,
    Defendant and Appellant.
    Joseph Samuel Mustin appeals from the judgment
    sentencing him to state prison after the trial court found him in
    violation of probation.
    In 2021, Mustin entered a Walmart store, concealed
    merchandise in his backpack, and ran out the door without
    paying. When confronted by a store employee, he swung a
    baseball bat in the air and yelled for employees to not stop him.
    Mustin pleaded guilty to second degree robbery (Pen. Code,
    §§ 211, 212.5, subd. (c)). The court placed him on two years’
    probation with terms including 285 days in county jail.
    In 2023, the court found Mustin in violation of probation.
    The court terminated probation and sentenced him to prison for
    the low term of two years. The court awarded credit for time
    served of 324 days actual time plus conduct credit of 15 percent
    (49 days) (Pen. Code, § 2933.1, subd. (c)).
    We appointed counsel to represent Mustin in this appeal.
    After counsel examined the record, she filed an opening brief that
    raises no arguable issues. On March 22, 2024, appointed counsel
    advised Mustin by mail that he had 30 days within which to file a
    supplemental brief to raise any issues he wished us to consider.
    We have not received a response.
    We have reviewed the entire record and are satisfied that
    Mustin’s attorney has fully complied with her responsibilities and
    that no arguable issue exists. (People v. Wende (1979) 
    25 Cal.3d 436
    , 441-443.)
    The judgment is affirmed.
    NOT TO BE PUBLISHED.
    BALTODANO, J.
    We concur:
    GILBERT, P. J.         YEGAN, J.
    2
    Paul W. Baelly, Judge
    Superior Court County of Ventura
    ______________________________
    Gloria C. Cohen, under appointment by the Court of
    Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
    No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: B332404

Filed Date: 5/30/2024

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 5/30/2024