People v. Addison CA4/2 ( 2023 )


Menu:
  • Filed 12/8/23 P. v. Addison CA4/2
    NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
    California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for
    publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication
    or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
    IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
    FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
    DIVISION TWO
    THE PEOPLE,
    Plaintiff and Respondent,                                      E081811
    v.                                                                      (Super.Ct.No. SWF1300354)
    SCOTT MCINTOSH ADDISON,                                                 OPINION
    Defendant and Appellant.
    APPEAL from the Superior Court of Riverside County. Randall S. Stamen,
    Judge. Dismissed.
    Reed Webb, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and
    Appellant.
    No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.
    INTRODUCTION
    Defendant Scott McIntosh Addison appeals the trial court’s denial of his petition
    for resentencing under Penal Code section 1170.18. Counsel filed a brief raising no
    arguable issues under People v. Delgadillo (2022) 
    14 Cal.5th 216
     (Delgadillo).
    1
    On October 3, 2023, we notified defendant that: (1) counsel filed a brief
    indicating no arguable issues had been identified; (2) as a case arising from an order
    denying postconviction relief, this court was not required to conduct an independent
    review of the record, but we could do so in our discretion; and (3) in accordance with the
    procedures set forth in Delgadillo, he had 30 days in which to file a supplemental brief
    raising any argument he wanted this court to consider. We also notified defendant that if
    we did not receive a brief within that 30-day period, we may dismiss the appeal as
    abandoned. More than 30 days have elapsed, and we have received no communication
    from defendant.
    We consider defendant’s appeal abandoned and order the appeal dismissed.
    (Delgadillo, supra, 14 Cal.5th at p. 232.)
    DISPOSITION
    The appeal is dismissed.
    NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
    FIELDS
    J.
    We concur:
    CODRINGTON
    Acting P.J.
    RAPHAEL
    J.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: E081811

Filed Date: 12/8/2023

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 12/8/2023