People v. Hall CA2/6 ( 2024 )


Menu:
  • Filed 10/14/24 P. v. Hall CA2/6
    NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
    California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions
    not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion
    has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
    IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
    SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
    DIVISION SIX
    THE PEOPLE,                                                  2d Crim. No. B331550
    (Super. Ct. No. MA082816)
    Plaintiff and Respondent,                                (Los Angeles County)
    v.
    DERRICK EDWARD HALL,
    Defendant and Appellant.
    Between December 2020 and May 2021, police seized more
    than a dozen sick and dead puppies from Derrick Edward Hall’s
    Los Angeles residence. Police also found several motorcycles
    being dismantled in the garage.
    Hall pleaded guilty to animal cruelty (Pen. Code, § 597,
    subd. (b)) and owning or operating a chop shop (Veh. Code,
    § 10801). The trial court sentenced him to three years in county
    jail on the chop shop conviction and a concurrent two years for
    animal cruelty. The court also ordered him to pay $10,106 in
    restitution to reimburse Los Angeles County for the cost of caring
    for the puppies seized from his residence.
    We appointed counsel to represent Hall in his appeal from
    the restitution order. After counsel examined the record, she
    filed an opening brief that raises no arguable issues. She then
    tried to send the case file to Hall, but was unable to make contact
    with him despite multiple attempts. On July 22, 2024, we too
    attempted to contact Hall to advise him that he had 30 days to
    submit any contentions or issues he wished us to consider. Our
    letter was returned as undeliverable.
    We have reviewed the entire record and are satisfied that
    Hall’s attorney fully complied with her responsibilities and that
    no arguable issue exists. (People v. Wende (1979) 
    25 Cal.3d 436
    ,
    441.)
    The judgment is affirmed.
    NOT TO BE PUBLISHED.
    BALTODANO, J.
    We concur:
    YEGAN, Acting P. J.
    CODY, J.
    2
    Robert G. Chu, Judge
    Superior Court County of Los Angeles
    ______________________________
    Christina J. Alvarez, under appointment by the
    Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
    No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: B331550

Filed Date: 10/11/2024

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/11/2024