Cole v. Pearce , 1 Cal. Dist. Ct. 40 ( 1857 )

Hester, J.

Upon these facts, and on the authority of Reynolds vs. Pixley, April term, 1856,1 hold that no dedication was made of the property to the use of a homestead prior to the date of the mortgage, and that as the property was not then impressed with the attribute of homestead, the mortgage was valid and the complainant entitled to a decree.